HPC · Science Deep Dive 6 April 2026 · revised 2026-04-06

The Creatine Brain Benefits That Science Can, and Cannot, Confirm.

The brain burns through ATP faster than any other organ, and creatine buffers that supply. Whether supplementation meaningfully improves cognition is another matter: the evidence is conditional, contested, and far more nuanced than the supplement aisle suggests. Here is what the science actually says, and what to do with it.

Section: Bio-Performance
Reading time: 22 min read
Sources: 52 · reviewed

01The Second Career

Creatine's brain audition: plausible mechanism, conditional evidence

The molecule that built a $14 billion sports supplement industry has been quietly auditioning for a second career. Creatine, the same compound that gym culture associated with bigger muscles and heavier lifts, is now the subject of more than 680 clinical trials investigating whether it can do for the brain what it demonstrably does for skeletal muscle: buffer the energy supply when demand outstrips delivery.[21] The premise is plausible. The brain accounts for roughly 20% of the body's total energy consumption despite representing just 2% of its mass.[26] Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) is required for every action potential, every synaptic transmission, every moment of sustained attention, and neurons burn through it at a rate of approximately 4.7 billion molecules per second per cortical neuron.[12] If creatine can even marginally improve ATP availability in neural tissue, the cognitive implications would be significant.

That "if" carries more weight than most supplement marketing acknowledges. The evidence that has accumulated since Caroline Rae's 2003 vegetarian trial is genuinely interesting, and genuinely incomplete.[31] Two independent meta-analyses report memory improvements in older adults.[42][30] A neuroimaging study captured real-time brain energy changes after a single dose.[17] A large epidemiological survey found a striking association between dietary creatine and depression prevalence.[3] Together, these findings suggest creatine does something in the brain. The question this article examines is what, exactly, and for whom.

The answer, as the best evidence currently frames it, is conditional. Creatine brain benefits appear concentrated in populations whose phosphocreatine reserves are already depleted: by age, by dietary restriction, by sleep deprivation, or by clinical pathology.[33] In healthy young adults eating a normal diet and sleeping well, the two largest independent trials found essentially nothing.[33][27] That pattern is not a failure of creatine research. It is the research's most important finding.

01 · The history

The trajectory of creatine brain benefits research follows a pattern familiar in nutritional neuroscience: an early striking finding, a wave of enthusiasm, then a slow, uncomfortable correction toward nuance. Rae's 2003 crossover trial in vegetarians showed improvements in working memory and fluid intelligence so pronounced (p < 0.0001) that it became the founding citation for an entire research programme.[31] The logic was clean: vegetarians have lower baseline brain creatine because they consume almost none through diet; supplementing restores what diet withholds; cognition improves. The dietary gap hypothesis was born.

What followed was a decade of studies attempting to extend that finding to the general population. Some showed benefits; many did not. A 2025 article in the Journal of Nutrition documented what had become obvious to field insiders: "public enthusiasm and commercial promotion have far exceeded the strength of the supporting evidence."[46] The gap between what creatine demonstrably does in the brain and what the supplement industry implies it does has become one of the more useful case studies in the translation problem, the distance between a promising mechanistic hypothesis and a justified health claim.

This article does not settle that translation problem. It ranks the evidence, names the uncertainties, and identifies the specific conditions under which creatine brain benefits have survived rigorous testing. The answer is narrower than the headlines suggest, and more interesting.

02The Mechanism

The Phosphocreatine Buffer That Keeps Neurons Firing

Every neuron in the cerebral cortex is, at its most basic level, an energy management problem. The brain's primary currency is ATP, and the demand is relentless. Firing rates fluctuate, but the baseline metabolic cost of maintaining neuronal membrane potentials alone consumes roughly two-thirds of the brain's total energy budget.[12] When a neuron fires, ATP expenditure spikes. When it engages in sustained cognitive effort, holding information in working memory or suppressing a prepotent response, the local demand can outstrip the supply rate from oxidative phosphorylation, the primary ATP production pathway.[4] This is where creatine enters the story.

The phosphocreatine system operates as a temporal bridge. When ATP supply exceeds immediate demand, the enzyme creatine kinase transfers a phosphate group from ATP to free creatine, storing it as phosphocreatine. When demand surges, the reaction runs in reverse: phosphocreatine donates its phosphate back to adenosine diphosphate (ADP), regenerating ATP within milliseconds.[44] The reaction is orders of magnitude faster than oxidative phosphorylation. In muscle physiology, this is the system that powers the first 8–10 seconds of a sprint; in neural tissue, it buffers transient energy shortfalls during periods of high cognitive demand.[1]

The body synthesises roughly 1–2 grams of creatine daily in the liver and kidneys, and an omnivorous diet supplies another 1–2 grams through meat and fish.[4] Vegetarians and vegans consume essentially none through diet, making them dependent on endogenous synthesis alone. That detail will matter when we reach the evidence.

The phosphocreatine energy buffer: oral and endogenous creatine enters the brain through the rate-limiting SLC6A8 transporter, raising the PCr pool by just 3–10%, where creatine kinase regenerates ATP within milliseconds to bridge demand spikes in the cerebral cortex.

Diagram · HPC

That buffering function only matters if the buffer can be filled. In muscle, this is straightforward. Creatine crosses capillary walls by passive diffusion and active transport, and muscle tissue absorbs it readily: supplementation increases intramuscular creatine stores by 20–30% within days.[44] The brain faces a different logistics problem. The blood-brain barrier does not permit passive creatine entry. Instead, creatine must be actively transported through a dedicated carrier protein, the SLC6A8 transporter, embedded in the endothelial cells lining cerebral capillaries.[6][36]

This transporter is the rate-limiting step in the entire creatine brain benefits story. Its expression is tightly regulated, and its capacity appears to saturate at relatively low concentrations. When Forbes and colleagues reviewed 12 human magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) studies measuring brain creatine after oral supplementation, they found increases ranging from 3% to 10%, with a typical value around 6%.[15] Lyoo's 2003 31P-MRS study, using a loading protocol of 0.3 g/kg per day, measured frontal lobe increases of 8.1–9.3%.[23] Kondo's dose-ranging study in adolescent females with treatment-resistant depression found a 9.1% increase in frontal phosphocreatine at 10 g/day.[20]

The brain also synthesises creatine locally. Neurons and oligodendrocytes express the enzymes AGAT and GAMT, which catalyse the two-step synthesis of creatine from arginine, glycine, and methionine.[49] This local production supplements, but does not replace, transport from the bloodstream. The relative contributions of local synthesis versus transport remain uncertain, though mutations in SLC6A8 that abolish transport produce severe cerebral creatine deficiency with profound intellectual disability, indicating that transport is indispensable.[37]

03Evidence

The Five Strongest Studies on Creatine Brain Benefits

01The claim

The single load-bearing finding

The hero study finds 0.31 SMD.

Pooled estimate

0.31

02How we measured

Grading the cognition trials

Studies scored on design, sample, rigour, causality, replication.

With two meta-analyses carrying published corrections and the field's largest independent trials showing null results in healthy young adults, replication status and sample adequacy are the decisive criteria here.

Rubric weights

Design/35

Sample/20

Rigour/15

Causality/15

Replication/15

03The spread

Heterogeneity across 5 studies

Effect sizes across the ranked studies.

Spread

76 → 66 /100

Range of point estimates across ranked studies.

04What does not hold

Negative knowledge

What the evidence base does not support.

The methodological criticisms deserve direct address. Both meta-analyses in this hierarchy, Xu (2024) and Prokopidis (2022), have been criticised for unit-of-analysis errors, where multiple outcome measures from the same participants are treated as independent data points, artificially inflating statistical power.[13] The Prokopidis team acknowledged the error; their re-analysis reduced the overall memory effect from significant (SMD = 0.29) to non-significant (SMD = 0.19).[30] The Xu meta-analysis faces the same critique but has not yet been formally re-analysed, t

Consumer dose

The studies

5 trials. One pooled answer.

Below: the anchor study in full; then the forest plot at scale; then the supporting trials in ranked order.

01Anchor

, The effects of creatine supplementation on cognitive function in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Xu 2024 Meta-Analysis · 16 RCTs · Independent Funding

The largest meta-analysis on creatine and cognition to date, synthesising 492 participants across 16 randomised controlled trials spanning ages 20 to 76. The memory finding (SMD = 0.31) represents a small-to-moderate effect that has not been affected by the paper's 2025 corrigendum. That corrige

Rubric breakdown

Design26/35

Sample16/20

Rigour11/15

Causality10/15

Replication7/10

Citations6/10

Total 76/100

The strongest studies, ranked by methodological weight.

Each scored 0–100 against a six-criterion rubric, tagged by design and year; the anchor leads.

Anchor (Rank 1) Supporting

Rank Authors & title Journal · Year Finding Score

Nejad

, Single dose creatine improves cognitive performance and induces changes in cerebral high energy phosphates during sleep deprivation

· 2024

A single high dose (0.35 g/kg, approximately 24–25 g) improved processing speed by approximately 16–29% and memory by roughly 10% during 21-hour sleep deprivation, with simultaneous increases in cerebral PCr/Pi ratio of approximately 4–6%. A 2026 follow-up from the same group replicated the brain energy findings.

74/100

Prokopidis

, Effects of creatine supplementation on memory in healthy individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs

· 2022

The overall memory effect (SMD = 0.29) is no longer statistically significant after correction for a unit-of-analysis error (corrected SMD = 0.19, 95% CI: −0.07–0.46, p = 0.15). The older adult subgroup (ages 66–76) showed a large effect that survives the correction: SMD = 0.88 (p = 0.009, 95% CI: 0.22–1.55).

68/100

Rae

, Oral creatine monohydrate supplementation improves brain performance: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial

· 2003

Young adult vegetarians (N = 45, including 18 vegans) showed significant improvements in backward digit span (from approximately 7 to 8.5 numbers) and Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices after creatine supplementation. The effect was attributed to vegetarians having lower baseline brain creatine stores.

66/100

Sandkühler

, The effects of creatine supplementation on cognitive performance, a randomised controlled study

· 2023

No significant effect of creatine (5 g/day for 6 weeks) on any of 10 cognitive tasks in 123 healthy adults (Raven's APM: p = 0.327). Bayesian analysis supported small beneficial effects but "strongly against larger effects reported in prior studies." A trend for backward digit span (d = 0.17, p = 0.064) was consistent with a very small true effect in young healthy adults.

72/100

04Stakes

The Cost of Ignoring Brain Energy

Creatine's cognitive role becomes most visible when you trace what happens in its absence, from age-related cognitive decline to rare genetic disorders that eliminate brain creatine entirely.

01 System 01 · System 01

Age-Related Cognitive Decline

The brain's mitochondrial efficiency declines with age, reducing baseline ATP production capacity. This creates precisely the energetic deficit that the phosphocreatine buffer is designed to address. A 2020 review documented how energy metabolism decline in the aging brain contributes to neurodegeneration through cumulative oxidative damage.[43] Dietary creatine intake above 0.95 g/day was associated with better cognition in NHANES adults over 60.[29]

2020

In practice

slower recall, mental fatigue during sustained tasks, word-finding difficulty

02 System 02 · System 02

Creatine Transporter Deficiency

When the SLC6A8 gene is mutated, creatine cannot enter the brain at all, producing severe intellectual disability, speech delay, and seizures.[37] Of treated patients, 36% (10 of 25) responded to creatine supplementation; of those who responded, 90% had started treatment before age 9.[38] The complete absence of brain creatine produces a clinical picture so severe it underscores how essential the phosphocreatine system is to normal cognition.

In practice

severe developmental delay, absent or limited speech, seizures

System 03 · System 03

Depression and Brain Energetics

In an NHANES analysis of 22,692 adults, depression prevalence was 10.23 per 100 in the lowest dietary creatine quartile versus 5.98 per 100 in the highest, approximately 41% lower unadjusted prevalence; after adjustment for confounders, the association remained (AOR = 0.68, meaning approximately 32% lower adjusted odds).[3] This is an association, not a proven causal relationship. The study's authors explicitly noted that depression may reduce dietary intake, making low creatine a consequence rather than a cause. Prefrontal creatine levels have been independently linked to grey matter volume changes in depressed patients.[14]

22,692

In practice

persistent low mood, impaired concentration, reduced motivation

04 System 04 · System 04

Metabolic Stress and Acute Performance

Sleep deprivation, altitude exposure, and sustained cognitive overload all deplete brain phosphocreatine faster than it can be replenished.[24][25] The brain under metabolic stress is running on a shallower energy reserve, exactly the condition under which supplementation shows its strongest effects. McMorris's sleep deprivation studies from 2006–2007 were among the first to document this vulnerability.[24][25]

In practice

brain fog after poor sleep, impaired decision-making under fatigue, cognitive slowdown at altitude

05Protocol

A Conditional Creatine Protocol for Brain Energy

This protocol is evidence-informed, not evidence-mandated. The science supports these steps for specific populations; it does not prove universal cognitive enhancement.

The protocol, as a sequence.

Daily → Morning → Ongoing → Quarterly

01 Step 01 · Daily

Baseline Loading

Take 3–5 g of creatine monohydrate daily for a minimum of 4 weeks before expecting any cognitive signal.

Why

Brain creatine increases lag behind muscle by weeks: the blood-brain barrier's transport rate means saturation takes substantially longer than the 5–7 days typical for muscle loading.[15][22] A 2026 methodological review noted that many null cognitive studies used supplementation periods too short for meaningful brain accumulation.[46]

3–5 Take 3–5 g of creatine monohydrate daily for a minimum of 4 weeks before expecti

Common mistake

Taking creatine for 1–2 weeks, seeing no cognitive effect, and concluding it does not work. The brain's loading curve is fundamentally slower than muscle's.

02 Step 02 · Morning

Consistent Timing

Take creatine at the same time daily, with a meal containing carbohydrates or protein.

Why

Insulin-mediated uptake improves creatine absorption systemically;[22] consistency ensures steady-state blood levels that maximise the saturation-limited SLC6A8 transporter's throughput.[6] The ISSN position stand notes creatine monohydrate is the most extensively studied and cost-effective form.[22]

Take creatine at the same time daily, with a meal containing carbohydrates or pr

Common mistake

Cycling creatine on and off, using expensive alternative forms (ethyl ester, buffered, hydrochloride) that have no demonstrated brain-specific advantage, or taking it on an empty stomach.

03 Step 03 · Ongoing

Population Check

Assess whether you belong to a population with demonstrated benefit: vegetarian/vegan, over 60, regularly sleep-deprived, or under chronic cognitive load.

Why

The evidence hierarchy shows benefits concentrated in energy-depleted populations.[33][31][30] If you are a healthy young adult eating an omnivorous diet and sleeping well, the two largest independent trials found no cognitive improvement at any dose tested.[33][27]

60 Assess whether you belong to a population with demonstrated benefit: vegetarian/

Common mistake

Assuming universal benefit because creatine works for muscle performance. Brain uptake and muscle uptake face fundamentally different constraints.

04 Step 04 · Quarterly

Safety and Monitoring

Maintain adequate hydration and consult a physician if you have pre-existing kidney conditions. Otherwise, no clinical adverse events across 680+ trials and 12,800+ participants.

Why

The safety record of creatine monohydrate is among the most thoroughly documented of any supplement. The Kreider (2025) comprehensive review found zero clinical adverse events across over 680 trials.[21] These safety data span multiple conditions (athletic, medical, neurological), not just cognitive supplementation. The FDA granted creatine GRAS (Generally Recognised as Safe) status in 2020.[21]

680 Maintain adequate hydration and consult a physician if you have pre-existing kid

Common mistake

Avoiding creatine due to debunked myths about kidney damage or dehydration. Meta-analyses and the ISSN position stand have repeatedly found no evidence for these claims in healthy individuals.[2][18]

06Verdict

The verdict.

Creatine helps brains that are running low. It does not measurably help brains that are already full., Adapted from Sandkühler et al. (2023)

Bottom line

The brain's energy buffer is real, the science is promising, and the honest answer is not yet universal, which is precisely what makes the conditional findings worth taking seriously.

The brain uses creatine to buffer its ATP supply, and supplementation raises brain creatine levels by 3–10%. In populations with depleted phosphocreatine reserves (older adults, vegetarians, the sleep-deprived, and those with clinical creatine deficiency), supplementation produces measurable cognitive improvements. In healthy young adults eating a normal diet, the two largest independent trials fo

Same supplement, two delivery realities

The brain gets a fraction of muscle's share.

01Claim

Conditional Brain Energy Buffer

The phosphocreatine system buffers brain ATP supply, and supplementation increases brain creatine by 3–10%. Cognitive benefits are concentrated in energy-depleted populations, older adults, vegetarians, and those under metabolic stress, while healthy young adults show no detectable improvement.

02Consequence

The Marketing-Evidence Gap

Supplement marketing frames creatine brain benefits as universal. The ranked evidence shows they are conditional. Acting on the marketing rather than the evidence means most buyers are supplementing for a benefit they are unlikely to receive, while the populations most likely to benefit (older adults, vegetarians) are underrepresented in the consumer base.

03Lever

Targeted Supplementation

For individuals in demonstrated-benefit populations, 3–5 g/day creatine monohydrate for ≥4 weeks is safe, affordable, and supported by the strongest available evidence. The lever is not creatine itself. It is knowing whether your brain is the kind that benefits.

07Bibliography

52 sources · ~7h est. corpus read · 52 visible

RCT · 1 Meta · 4 Review · 1 Journal · 45 Book · 1

Type

Sort

01 Journal

Adhihetty, P. J., & Beal, M. F2008

Creatine and its potential therapeutic value for targeting cellular energy impairment in neurodegenerative diseases

Neuromolecular Medicine10(4) · 275–290

doi: 10.1007/s12017-008-8053-y
02 Journal

Antonio, J., Candow, D. G., Forbes, S. C., et al2021

Common questions and misconceptions about creatine supplementation: What does the scientific evidence really show? *Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition*, 18(1), Article 13

Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition18(1) · 2970-021

doi: 10.1186/s12970-021-00412-w
03 Journal

Bakian, A. V., Huber, R. S., Scholl, L., Renshaw, P. F., & Kondo, D2020

Dietary creatine intake and depression risk among U.S. adults

Translational Psychiatry10(1) · 1398-020

doi: 10.1038/s41398-020-0741-x
04 Journal

Balestrino, M., & Adriano, E2019

Beyond sports: Efficacy and safety of creatine supplementation in pathological or paraphysiological conditions of brain and muscle

Medicinal Research Reviews39(6) · 2427–2459

doi: 10.1002/med.21590
05 Journal

Beard, E., & Braissant, O2010

Synthesis and transport of creatine in the CNS: Importance for cerebral functions

Journal of Neurochemistry115(2) · 297–313

doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.06935.x
06 Journal

Braissant, O., Béard, E., Slotboom, J., & Boesch, C2012

Creatine and guanidinoacetate transport at blood-brain and blood-cerebrospinal fluid barriers

Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease35(3) · 401–413

doi: 10.1007/s10545-011-9433-2
07 Journal

Braissant, O., Henry, H., Béard, E., & Uldry, J2008

AGAT, GAMT and SLC6A8 distribution in the central nervous system, in relation to creatine deficiency syndromes

Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease31(2) · 230–239

doi: 10.1007/s10545-008-0826-9
08 Journal

Camandola, S., & Mattson, M. P2017

Brain metabolism in health, aging, and neurodegeneration

EMBO Molecular Medicine9(8) · 1171–1184
09 Journal

Candow, D. G., Forbes, S. C., Ostojic, S. M., et al2023

"Heads Up" for creatine supplementation and its potential applications for brain health and function

Sports Medicine49–65

doi: 10.1007/s40279-023-01870-9
10 Journal

Candow, D. G., Pratt, J., Fabiano, N., et al2026

Creatine supplementation and the brain: Have we put the cart before the horse? *Journal of Dietary Supplements*

Journal of Dietary Supplements

doi: 10.1080/19390211.2026.2616440
11 Journal

Candow, D. G., Vogt, E., Johannsmeyer, S., Forbes, S. C., & Farthing, J. P2025

Creatine monohydrate supplementation for older adults and clinical populations

Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition

doi: 10.1080/15502783.2025.2534130
12 Journal

Dienel, G. A2019

Brain glucose metabolism: Integration of energetics with function

Physiological Reviews99(1) · 949–1045

doi: 10.1152/physrev.00062.2017
13 Journal

EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergens2024

Creatine and improvement in cognitive function: Evaluation of a health claim

EFSA Journal22(9)

doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.9100
14 Journal

Faulkner, P., et al2021

Relationship between depression, prefrontal creatine and grey matter volume

Journal of Psychopharmacology35(11) · 1333–1342

doi: 10.1177/02698811211050550
15 Journal

Forbes, S. C., et al2022

Effects of creatine supplementation on brain function and health

Nutrients14(5)

doi: 10.3390/nu14050921
16 Journal

Gonzalez-Lima, F., & Valla, J2025

Energy metabolism and brain aging: Strategies to delay neuronal degeneration

Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology0571-025

doi: 10.1007/s10571-025-01555-z
17 Journal

Gordji-Nejad, A., et al2024

Single dose creatine improves cognitive performance and induces changes in cerebral high energy phosphates during sleep deprivation

Scientific Reports1598-024

doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54249-9
18 Journal

Jäger, R., Forbes, S. C., & Candow, D. G2025

Safety of creatine supplementation: Analysis of the prevalence of reported side effects in clinical trials and adverse event reports

Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition22(1)

doi: 10.1080/15502783.2025.2488937
19 Journal

Kondo, D. G., et al2011

Open-label adjunctive creatine for female adolescents with SSRI-resistant major depressive disorder

Journal of Affective Disorders135(1–3) · 1–3

doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.06.026
20 Journal

Kondo, D. G., et al2016

Creatine target engagement with brain bioenergetics: A dose-ranging 31P-MRS study

Amino Acids48(8) · 1941–1954
21 Journal

Kreider, R. B., et al2025

Creatine supplementation is safe, beneficial throughout the lifespan, and should not be restricted

Frontiers in Nutrition

doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1578564
22 Journal

Kreider, R. B., et al2017

International Society of Sports Nutrition position stand: Safety and efficacy of creatine supplementation

Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition2970-017

doi: 10.1186/s12970-017-0173-z
23 Journal

Lyoo, I. K., et al2003

Multinuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of high-energy phosphate metabolites in human brain following oral creatine supplementation

Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging123(2) · 87–100

doi: 10.1016/S0925-4927(03)00046-5
24 Journal

McMorris, T., et al2006

Effect of creatine supplementation and sleep deprivation on cognitive and psychomotor performance

Psychopharmacology185(1) · 93–103

doi: 10.1007/s00213-005-0269-z
25 Journal

McMorris, T., et al2007

Creatine supplementation, sleep deprivation, cortisol, melatonin and behavior

Physiology & Behavior90(1) · 21–28

doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.08.024
26 Journal

Mergenthaler, P., Lindauer, U., Dienel, G. A., & Meisel, A2013

Sugar for the brain: The role of glucose in physiological and pathological brain function

Trends in Neurosciences36(10) · 587–597
27 Journal

Moriarty, T., et al2023

Dose-response of creatine supplementation on cognitive function in healthy young adults

Brain Sciences13(9)

doi: 10.3390/brainsci13091276
28 Review

Nobile, V., et al2024

Creatine supplementation in depression: A review of mechanisms, efficacy, clinical outcomes, and future directions

Nutrients16(21)
29 Journal

Ostojic, S. M., Korovljev, D., & Stajer, V2021

Dietary creatine and cognitive function in U.S. adults aged 60 years and over

Aging Clinical and Experimental Research33(6) · 1793–1797

doi: 10.1007/s40520-021-01857-4
30 Meta

Prokopidis, K., et al2022

Effects of creatine supplementation on memory in healthy individuals: A systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs

Nutrition Reviews81(4) · 416–427

doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuac064
31 RCT

Rae, C., Digney, A. L., McEwan, S. R., & Bates, T. C2003

Oral creatine monohydrate supplementation improves brain performance: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial

Proceedings of the Royal Society B270(1529) · 2147–2150

doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2492
32 Journal

Rosenblat, J. D., Carvalho, A. F., & McIntyre, R. S2025

The role of brain creatine in behavioral health conditions

Frontiers in Psychiatry

doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1667639
33 Journal

Sandkühler, J. F., et al2023

The effects of creatine supplementation on cognitive performance, a randomised controlled study

BMC Medicine2916-023

doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-03146-5
34 Journal

Smith, A. E., Forbes, S. C., & Candow, D. G2025

Creatine monohydrate pilot in Alzheimer's: Feasibility, brain creatine, and cognition

Alzheimer's & Dementia: TRCI11(2)

doi: 10.1002/trc2.70101
35 Journal

Stajer, V., et al2021

Dietary intake of creatine and risk of medical conditions in U.S. older men and women

Nutrients13(10)
36 Journal

Stockebrand, M., Isbrandt, D., & Kreis, R2020

The creatine transporter unfolded: A knotty premise in the cerebral creatine deficiency syndrome

Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience

doi: 10.3389/fnsyn.2020.588954
37 Journal

Stockler, S., Mercimek-Mahmutoglu, S., & Salomons, G2020

Creatine deficiency disorders. In M. P. Adam (Ed.), *GeneReviews*. NCBI Bookshelf NBK3794.

GeneReviews
38 Journal

van de Kamp, J. M., et al2014

Phenotype and genotype in 101 males with X-linked creatine transporter deficiency

Journal of Medical Genetics50(7) · 463–472
39 Meta

van Loon, C., Prokopidis, K., & Giannos, P2025

Creatine and cognition in aging: A systematic review of evidence in older adults

Nutrition Reviews

doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuaf135
40 Book

Walker, M2017

*Why we sleep: Unlocking the power of sleep and dreams*. Scribner.

Why we sleep: Unlocking the power of sleep and dreams
41 Journal

Watanabe, A., Kato, N., & Kato, T2002

Effects of creatine on mental fatigue and cerebral hemoglobin oxygenation

Neuroscience Research42(4) · 279–285

doi: 10.1016/S0168-0102(02)00007-X
42 Meta

Xu, C., Bi, S., Zhang, W., & Luo, L2024

The effects of creatine supplementation on cognitive function in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Frontiers in Nutrition

doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1424972
43 Journal

Yin, F., Boveris, A., & Cadenas, E2020

Energy metabolism decline in the aging brain, Pathogenesis of neurodegenerative disorders

Metabolites10(11)

doi: 10.3390/metabo10110450
44 Journal

Wyss, M., & Kaddurah-Daouk, R2000

Creatine and creatinine metabolism

Physiological Reviews80(3) · 1107–1213

doi: 10.1152/physrev.2000.80.3.1107
45 Journal

Allen, P. J2023

Creatine as a therapeutic target in Alzheimer's disease

Ageing Research Reviews
46 Journal

Creatine supplementation and brain health, methodological challenges2026

*The Journal of Nutritional Physiology*

The Journal of Nutritional Physiology6247(26) · 3050-6247

doi: 10.1016/S3050-6247(26)00003-3
47 Journal

Kondo, D. G2011

Open-label adjunctive creatine for female adolescents with SSRI-resistant MDD

Journal of Affective Disorders135(1–3) · 1–3

doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.06.026
48 Journal

Gonzalez, A. M., & Pavlock, Z. J2023

Neuroprotection and therapeutic implications of creatine supplementation for brain injury complications

Antioxidants12(4)

doi: 10.3390/antiox12040910
49 Journal

Braissant, O., et al2005

Creatine synthesis and transport during rat embryogenesis

BMC Developmental Biology
50 Journal

McMorris, T., & Hale, B. J2012

Differential effects of differing intensities of acute exercise on speed and accuracy of cognition: A meta-analytical investigation

Brain and Cognition80(3) · 338–351
51 Meta

Adcock, K. S., Cassidy, J. S., & Looney, D. P2024

Creatine supplementation research fails to support the theoretical basis for an effect on cognition: Evidence from a systematic review

Behavioural Brain Research

doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2024.114886
52 Journal

Candow, D. G., et al2025

Creatine monohydrate supplementation for older adults and clinical populations

Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition

The Creatine Brain Benefits That Science Can, and Cannot, Confirm.

Creatine's brain audition: plausible mechanism, conditional evidence

The Phosphocreatine Buffer That Keeps Neurons Firing