Skip to article
HPC  ·  Science Deep Dive 5 April 2026  ·  revised 2026-04-05

Blood Sugar and Brain Fog: The Glycaemic Science of Mental Clarity.

The brain burns a quarter of the body's glucose but tolerates remarkably little variation in supply, and the cognitive cost of that intolerance begins well before any blood test flags a problem. Here is what the science actually says, and what to do with it.

Section
Bio-Performance
Reading time
22 min read
Sources
47 · reviewed

01The Normal Range Problem

Dementia risk starts where medicine stops measuring

The organ that runs your conscious life weighs roughly 1.4 kilograms. It accounts for about two per cent of your body mass. And it burns through approximately 20–25 per cent of all the glucose your body produces at rest, a metabolic expense no other tissue comes close to matching.[1] That ratio is not a curiosity. It is a vulnerability. Because the brain cannot store glucose in any meaningful quantity, it depends on a continuous, tightly regulated supply from the bloodstream. When that supply fluctuates (spiking after a refined-carbohydrate lunch, crashing in the mid-afternoon), the organ that notices first is not the liver or the muscles. It is the one reading these words.

The experience most people describe as brain fog is not a clinical diagnosis. No blood panel tests for it. No imaging study can point to it on a scan. That diffuse sense of mental slowness, fractured attention, difficulty retrieving a word you know perfectly well: the subjective complaint maps onto measurable deficits in processing speed, working memory, and episodic recall that neuroscience can now trace, with increasing precision, back to how the body handles its primary fuel.[4][5]

The standard medical framework treats blood sugar as a binary problem: you are diabetic or you are not. Your fasting glucose is flagged or it is fine. That framing made sense when the evidence was limited to extreme dysregulation. It makes considerably less sense now. A study published in the New England Journal of Medicine tracked over 2,000 older adults for nearly seven years and found that dementia risk rose in a smooth, continuous gradient, not at the diabetic threshold but starting well within the range your GP would call entirely healthy.[2]

01 · The history

That finding did not arrive in isolation. Around the same period, a neuroimaging study from the PATH Through Life cohort examined 210 adults in their late sixties and early seventies (all cognitively healthy, none diabetic, none even qualifying as glucose-intolerant) and found that higher fasting blood glucose within the normal range was associated with measurably smaller frontal brain volumes and poorer cognitive scores.[3] The implication is uncomfortable: the tissue damage that most clinicians associate with full-blown type 2 diabetes appears to begin, at a structural level, inside glucose ranges that attract no clinical attention whatsoever.

This is not an argument for panic. It is an argument for precision. The mechanisms that link blood sugar brain fog to measurable cognitive impairment are increasingly well mapped. The glucose transporter proteins regulate fuel delivery across the blood-brain barrier; glycaemic variability triggers inflammatory cascades; insulin signalling disruptions compromise hippocampal function. What the science does not yet support is a clean, universal dose-response in healthy adults eating normal meals. The evidence is strong in metabolically impaired populations and in extreme glycaemic states. In healthy adults under ordinary conditions, the picture is far more nuanced, and that nuance is the real story.[5][47]

The trend data adds context. Global prevalence of high sugar-sweetened beverage consumption among young adults rose from 6.58% in 1990 to 11.13% in 2021, a 69% relative increase over three decades.[47] The dietary substrate for glycaemic disruption is expanding at the same time the science of its cognitive cost is sharpening.

02The Mechanism

The Fuel Architecture That Runs Your Cognition

Every thought you have costs glucose. Not metaphorically. Biochemically. The adult brain consumes approximately 5.6 milligrams of glucose per 100 grams of tissue per minute, a rate so high that even a brief supply interruption produces measurable cognitive effects.[1] Unlike muscle tissue, which can switch to fatty acid oxidation when glucose runs low, neurons are obligate glucose consumers under normal conditions. They maintain almost no glycogen reserve. They cannot wait.

The delivery system that keeps this engine running involves two families of glucose transporter proteins. GLUT1, concentrated at the blood-brain barrier endothelium and on astrocytes, handles the first stage: pulling glucose from the bloodstream into the brain's interstitial fluid. GLUT3, expressed predominantly on neurons, handles the second, delivering that glucose directly to the cells that fire action potentials and consolidate memories.[9][10] GLUT3 has a substantially higher affinity for glucose than GLUT1, which means neurons get priority access even when overall brain glucose dips. That is an evolutionary safeguard that protects cognition under mild fasting but fails catastrophically under sustained hypoglycaemia.[10]

This two-stage delivery system also explains why the brain does not simply use more glucose when cognitive demands increase. Regional uptake shifts (the prefrontal cortex draws more during executive tasks, the hippocampus during memory encoding), but total brain glucose consumption changes only modestly even under intense cognitive load.[17] The system is not a throttle. It is a distribution network, and its vulnerabilities are in the supply chain, not the demand signal.

Glucose spike 01 postprandial surge Mitochondrial ROS 02 oxidative stress NF-κB pathway 03 neuroinflammation Insulin receptors 04 receptor downregulate Cognitive decline 05 memory · speed

A postprandial glucose surge overloads mitochondria, triggering reactive oxygen species, the spark that ignites NF-κB-mediated neuroinflammation, collapses insulin-receptor signalling in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex, and erodes the synaptic plasticity that memory depends on.

Diagram · HPC

The vulnerability emerges not from chronic shortage but from variability. When blood glucose spikes after a high-glycaemic-index meal, the excess triggers a cascade that begins with reactive oxygen species production in mitochondria and escalates through microglial activation to pro-inflammatory cytokine release.[14][43] The key mediators are interleukin-6, tumour necrosis factor-alpha, and the NF-κB transcription pathway, the same inflammatory actors implicated in neurodegeneration. In animal models, chronic glucose variability activates this pathway repeatedly, producing a low-grade neuroinflammatory state that erodes synaptic integrity over time.[13][44]

The parallel pathway runs through insulin signalling. The brain is not "insulin-independent," as older textbooks claimed. Insulin receptors are densely expressed in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex, the regions most critical for memory consolidation and executive function.[11] When peripheral hyperinsulinaemia persists (the body's response to chronically elevated glucose), central insulin receptors downregulate, producing a state of brain insulin resistance that impairs synaptic plasticity, reduces hippocampal long-term potentiation, and in mouse models alters dopamine turnover in ways that produce measurable behavioural changes.[12][13]

An fMRI study by Xia and colleagues quantified part of this cost: in patients with type 2 diabetes, greater mean amplitude of glycaemic excursions (MAGE) correlated with reduced functional connectivity in the medial prefrontal cortex and poorer cognitive performance.[15] The imaging data confirmed what the mechanistic models predicted. Glycaemic variability does not just damage tissue over years. It disrupts neural network function in real time.

03Evidence

The Five Strongest Studies on Blood Sugar and Cognition

01The claim

The single load-bearing finding

The hero study finds 18 % higher dementia risk.

Pooled estimate

18

02How we measured

Grading the glycaemic trials

Studies scored on design, sample, rigour, causality, replication.

For blood sugar and cognition, design determines everything: observational cohorts establish the dose-response gradient, but only randomised glycaemic-control trials can test whether managing glucose actually protects the brain.

Rubric weights

Design/35
Sample/20
Rigour/15
Causality/15
Replication/15

03The spread

Heterogeneity across 5 studies

Effect sizes across the ranked studies.

Spread

90 → 51 /100

Range of point estimates across ranked studies.

04What does not hold

Negative knowledge

What the evidence base does not support.

A 2024 UK Biobank study of 210,832 participants found that higher absolute sugar intake was significantly associated with all-cause dementia risk (HR = 1.003 per gram per day; p < 0.001), a small per-unit effect that accumulates substantially across the tens of thousands of grams consumed over a lifetime.[7] Ranglani and colleagues, also using UK Biobank data (n = 39,283), demonstrated that higher HbA1c (the 3-month average blood glucose marker) was associated with poorer cognitive performance and reduced grey matter volume across the full glycaemic spectrum, not on

Consumer dose

The studies

5 trials. One pooled answer.

Below: the anchor study in full; then the forest plot at scale; then the supporting trials in ranked order.

The Key Study Highest rubric · 81/100 · load-bearing

01Anchor

, Glucose Levels and Risk of Dementia

Crane New England Journal of Medicine 2013 Prospective Cohort · Dose-Response · Non-Diabetic Population

Published in the New England Journal of Medicine, this prospective cohort followed 2,067 older adults (1,835 non-diabetic) with 35,264 serial glucose measurements over a median of 6.8 years. **The study demonstrated a continuous, linear dose-response between ambient blood glucose and dementia risk

Rubric breakdown

Design18/35
Sample18/20
Rigour13/15
Causality12/15
Replication10/10
Citations10/10
Total 81/100

The strongest studies, ranked by methodological weight.

Each scored 0–100 against a six-criterion rubric, tagged by design and year; the anchor leads.

050100 rubric 90 01 Crane Cohort · 2013 81 02 Lin Meta-analysis · 2023 89 03 Gillespie Meta-analysis · 2023 90 04 70 05 Mortby 2013 51 rubric score · out of 100
Anchor (Rank 1) Supporting
Rank Authors & title Journal · Year Finding Score

02

Lin

, Glycemic Control and Cognitive Impairment: Meta-Analysis of 13 RCTs

Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · 2023

Across 13 RCTs with 19,314 participants, glycaemic control interventions significantly attenuated cognitive decline (SMD = 0.15; 95% CI 0.05–0.26; p < 0.00001). MMSE subgroup (7 studies, n = 6,985): SMD = 0.18. Wechsler Memory Scale subgroup showed larger effects (SMD = 1.45). MoCA subgroup was non-significant, cautioning against overstatement.[21]

89/100

03

Gillespie

, Impact of Free and Added Sugars on Cognitive Function: Meta-Analysis of 77 Studies

Nutrients · 2023

All 3 cohort studies and 8 of 9 cross-sectional studies found significant associations between added sugar intake and cognitive impairment. Acute glucose improved immediate free recall vs controls (p = 0.002). Four studies identified reduced risk with natural fructose-containing foods (fruit), establishing a critical distinction between added and intrinsic sugars.[18]

90/100

04

Dye et al. (2024/2025), Dynamic Associations Between Glucose and Momentary Cognition in Type 1 Diabetes

Diabetes Care ·

Across 14 days of continuous glucose monitoring paired with 3× daily smartphone cognitive testing (~8,400 paired measurements), large glucose fluctuations predicted slower and less accurate processing speed. Sustained hyperglycaemia (>250 mg/dL) predicted cognitive slowing 3 hours later. Bidirectional effects confirmed: lower attention predicted higher subsequent glucose.[19][20]

70/100

05

Mortby

, High "Normal" Blood Glucose and Brain Volume in Cognitively Healthy Adults

PLOS ONE · 2013

In 210 cognitively healthy, non-diabetic adults aged 68–73 (glucose range 3.2–6.1 mmol/L, entirely within normal limits), higher fasting glucose was associated with reduced volumes in left middle frontal gyrus, right inferior frontal gyrus, and left precentral gyrus. These structural reductions predicted poorer working memory, processing speed, executive function, and language.[3]

51/100

04Stakes

The Downstream Cost of Glycaemic Dysregulation

Four systems that degrade when blood sugar regulation fails, from hippocampal atrophy to mood instability, the consequences compound across decades.

01 System 01 · System 01

Hippocampal Integrity

Type 2 diabetes is associated with a 4.4% reduction in hippocampal volume compared to non-diabetic controls, equivalent to roughly 4–5 years of normal ageing compressed into a metabolic consequence.[27] This structural loss translates directly into measurable deficits in episodic memory, the ability to encode and retrieve the experiences that constitute autobiographical life. The ELSA 10-year follow-up confirmed that each 1 mmol/mol increase in HbA1c accelerates the rate of global cognitive decline.[29]

2
In practice

Walking into a room and forgetting why, losing the thread of a conversation, struggling to recall what you read an hour ago

02 System 02 · System 02

Prefrontal Executive Function

The UK Biobank analysis of 39,283 participants found that higher HbA1c was associated with reduced grey matter volume and poorer performance on cognitive tests across the entire glycaemic spectrum, not only in diabetic ranges.[25] The prefrontal cortex, which governs planning, decision-making, and impulse control, is among the first regions to show volumetric loss. Prediabetes alone is associated with brain glucose hypometabolism (lower CMRglu) on PET imaging in women, appearing before any clinical symptoms.[28]

39,283
In practice

Difficulty prioritising tasks, making decisions more slowly, struggling to inhibit distractions, mental fatigue by mid-afternoon

03
System 03 · System 03

Dementia Risk Accumulation

People with type 2 diabetes face an approximately 59–73% increased risk of developing dementia, and this risk begins accumulating decades before diagnosis.[26] The UK Biobank sugar intake cohort (n = 210,832) found a small but significant per-gram-per-day hazard ratio that compounds over a lifetime of dietary exposure.[7] The damage is not sudden. It is a tax, levied daily, collected over decades, payable in cognitive currency. Glycaemic variability itself may amplify risk: a systematic review found a 2.65× increase in Alzheimer's risk with high glycaemic variability, though the confidence interval is wide.[32]

2
In practice

No immediate symptom, this is the silent accumulation that manifests as accelerated ageing of cognition in the sixth and seventh decades

04 System 04 · System 04

Mood and Metabolic Resilience

A meta-analysis of sugar consumption and mental health found that added sugar intake was associated with a 21% increased risk of depression (OR 1.21; 95% CI 1.14–1.27).[30] Metabolic syndrome, the cluster of insulin resistance, abdominal obesity, and dyslipidaemia, is associated with declining fluid intelligence and prospective memory across the adult lifespan.[33] The mood effects are not independent of the cognitive effects: they share an inflammatory substrate. The same NF-κB pathway that degrades synaptic plasticity also disrupts serotonergic signalling.

21% increase
In practice

Persistent low mood without clear cause, irritability after meals, energy crashes that feel emotional rather than physical

05Protocol

A Blood Sugar Brain Fog Protocol: Four Evidence-Informed Interventions

These steps are not prescriptions. They are translations, each one converts a mechanistic finding into a practical action that the intervention literature supports. The science supports these changes; it does not mandate them.

The protocol, as a sequence.

Morning → Post-Meal → Meals → Daily

Morning 01 Restructurethe Fuel Window Post-Meal 02 Move After Eating Meals 03 Front-LoadPolyphenols and Fibre Daily 04 Time-RestrictedEating Window
01 Step 01 · Morning

Restructure the Fuel Window

Replace high-GI breakfast with a low-glycaemic, protein-anchored meal (GL ≤20; protein ≥20g; added sugar <5g).

Why

The Lamport meta-analysis found that cognitive benefits of low-GL meals emerge 120+ minutes post-consumption, the peak mental performance window falls 2–4 hours after breakfast.[23] The Seidler meta-analysis confirmed that low-GI breakfasts produce better sustained cognitive performance than high-GI alternatives.[35]

20 Replace high-GI breakfast with a low-glycaemic, protein-anchored meal (GL ≤20; p
Common mistake

"Healthy" breakfasts, smoothie bowls, granola, fruit-and-yogurt parfaits, often spike glucose as steeply as frosted cereal due to concentrated fructose and rapid-release carbohydrates without adequate fibre buffering.

02 Step 02 · Post-Meal

Move After Eating

Walk briskly for 10–15 minutes within 30 minutes of your largest meal.

Why

Post-meal movement activates GLUT4 transporters in skeletal muscle independently of insulin, pulling glucose from the bloodstream and reducing the postprandial spike. The Wang systematic review found that exercise training improved both cognition and cerebral blood flow in type 2 diabetic populations.[37]

10–15 min Walk briskly for 10–15 minutes within 30 minutes of your largest meal.
Common mistake

Treating exercise as a separate wellness habit rather than a glucose-management tool. The timing, post-meal, not pre-meal, is the active variable.

03 Step 03 · Meals

Front-Load Polyphenols and Fibre

Include polyphenol-rich foods (≥80g mixed berries 3× per week) and dietary fibre (≥25g/day) at the start of meals.

Why

Polyphenols inhibit alpha-glucosidase and alpha-amylase, slowing carbohydrate digestion. Whyte's berry RCT showed sustained executive function benefits for 6 hours post-consumption in healthy young adults.[36] Dietary fibre intake is positively associated with cognitive function in US older adults (NHANES data).[38]

80 Include polyphenol-rich foods (≥80g mixed berries 3× per week) and dietary fibre
Common mistake

Taking polyphenol supplements without whole-food fibre. The food matrix matters: isolated compounds do not replicate whole-food glycaemic blunting.

04 Step 04 · Daily

Time-Restricted Eating Window

Compress eating to an 8–10 hour window (e.g. 8am–6pm); do not skip breakfast.

Why

Extended overnight fasting restores insulin sensitivity and reduces mean daily glycaemia. Rao's RCT found that 8 weeks of intermittent fasting improved executive function and memory in older insulin-resistant adults.[39] Cunnane's brain energy review suggests mild ketogenesis during extended fasts provides alternative neuronal fuel.[34]

8–10 Compress eating to an 8–10 hour window (e.g. 8am–6pm); do not skip breakfast.
Common mistake

Conflating fasting duration with caloric restriction. The cognitive benefit appears to come from glycaemic stabilisation and insulin resensitisation, not weight loss per se.

06Verdict

The verdict.

"The damage begins where medicine stops looking, inside the glucose range that every blood test calls normal.", Editorial synthesis of Crane (2013) and Mortby (2013)

Bottom line

You do not need to be diabetic for blood sugar to affect your thinking. You need only have a brain that runs on glucose, which is to say, you need only have a brain.

The human brain runs on glucose with almost no storage capacity, no backup fuel under normal conditions, and an inflammatory response that activates when supply fluctuates outside a narrow band. The clinical evidence is unambiguous: in people with diabetes, insulin resistance, or prediabetes, glycaemic dysregulation is associated with hippocampal atrophy, accelerated cognitive decline, and a 59–73

The whole argument, on one axis

The dose-response starts below the diabetic threshold.

0 20 40 60 80 % increased dementia risk TYPE 2 DIABETES · BIESSELS & DESPA 2018 59 to 73% NON-DIABETIC · 115 vs 100 mg/dL · CRANE 2013 NEJM 18%
01Claim

The gradient is continuous

The dose-response between blood glucose and cognitive harm does not begin at a diagnostic threshold. It operates as a continuous gradient, demonstrated in prospective cohorts, visible on neuroimaging, and replicated across populations. Normal is not the same as optimal.

Claim
02Consequence

The cost accumulates silently

The hippocampal atrophy, the prefrontal volume loss, and the dementia risk accumulate over decades before symptoms appear. By the time brain fog becomes persistent, the underlying metabolic architecture has been degrading for years. The window for prevention is larger than the window for treatment.

meta-analysis
03Lever

The interventions are simple

Low-glycaemic meals, post-meal movement, polyphenol-rich whole foods, and consistent meal timing, these are the interventions the evidence supports. They work by smoothing the fuel signal, not by eliminating glucose. The brain needs fuel. It needs stable fuel.

Lever

Editorial confidence

Low
Medium
Moderate-High

47 sources · Strong mechanistic basis · replicated prospective cohort evidence · meta-analytic confirmation of intervention effects · limited RCT evidence in healthy non-clinical populations

,  30 ,

07Bibliography

47 sources · ~6h est. corpus read · 47 visible

Meta · 8 Review · 2 Cohort · 3 Journal · 34
Type
Sort
  1. 01 Journal

    Mergenthaler, P., Lindauer, U., Dienel, G. A., & Meisel, A2013

    Sugar for the brain: The role of glucose in physiological and pathological brain function

    Trends in Neurosciences587–597

  2. 02 Journal

    Crane, P. K., Walker, R., Hubbard, R. A., Li, G., Nathan, D. M., Zheng, H., Haneuse, S., Craft, S., Montine, T. J., Kahn, S. E., McCormick, W., McCurry, S. M., Boyko, E. J., & Larson, E. B2013

    Glucose levels and risk of dementia

    New England Journal of Medicine540–548

  3. 03 Journal

    Mortby, M. E., Janke, A. L., Anstey, K. J., Sachdev, P. S., & Cherbuin, N2013

    High "normal" blood glucose is associated with decreased brain volume and cognitive performance in the 60s: The PATH through Life Study

    PLOS ONE

  4. 04 Journal

    Kerti, L., Witte, A. V., Winkler, A., Grittner, U., Rujescu, D., & Flöel, A2013

    Higher glucose levels associated with lower memory and reduced hippocampal microstructure

    Neurology1746–1752

  5. 05 Meta

    Lum, G. A., Guenther, P. M., & Bhattacharya, A2022

    The role of glucose in cognition, risk of dementia, and related biomarkers in individuals without type 2 diabetes mellitus or the metabolic syndrome: A systematic review of observational studies

    Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

  6. 06 Review

    Debras, C., Chazelas, E., Srour, B., Druesne-Pecollo, N., Esseddik, Y., de Edelenyi, F. S., Agaësse, C., De Sa, A., Lutchia, R., Kesse-Guyot, E., Julia, C., Allès, B., Galan, P., Hercberg, S., Deschasaux-Tanguy, M., & Touvier, M2022

    Sugar-sweetened beverages and adverse human health outcomes: An umbrella review of meta-analyses

    Annual Review of Nutrition113–140

  7. 07 Cohort

    Wang, J., Zhang, X., Xiong, X., Chen, J., Tang, J., Li, H., Peng, X., Wang, X., Tang, Y., & Bi, F2024

    Associations of sugar intake, high-sugar dietary pattern, and the risk of dementia: A prospective cohort study of 210,832 participants

    BMC Medicine2916-024

  8. 08 Journal

    Cunnane, S. C., Nugent, S., Roy, M., Courchesne-Loyer, A., Croteau, E., Tremblay, S., Castellano, A., Pifferi, F., Bocti, C., Paquet, N., Begdouri, H., Bentourkia, M., Turcotte, E., Bherer, L., Féthière, J., Planel, E., & Rapoport, S. I2011

    Brain fuel metabolism, aging, and Alzheimer's disease

    Nutrition3–20

  9. 09 Journal

    Patching, S. G2017

    Glucose transporters at the blood-brain barrier: Function, regulation and gateways for drug delivery

    Molecular Neurobiology1046–1060

  10. 10 Journal

    Shah, K., DeSilva, S., & Bhatt, D. L2021

    Glucose transporters in brain in health and disease

    Pflügers Archiv, European Journal of Physiology1299–1310

  11. 11 Journal

    Spinelli, M., Fusco, S., & Grassi, C2019

    Brain insulin resistance and hippocampal plasticity: Mechanisms and biomarkers of cognitive decline

    Frontiers in Neuroscience

  12. 12 Journal

    Kleinridders, A., Ferris, H. A., Cai, W., & Kahn, C. R2014

    Insulin action in brain regulates systemic metabolism and brain function

    Diabetes2232–2243

  13. 13 Journal

    Kleinridders, A., Cai, W., Cappellucci, L., Ghazarian, A., Collins, W. R., Vienberg, S. G., Pothos, E. N., & Kahn, C. R2015

    Insulin resistance in brain alters dopamine turnover and causes behavioral disorders

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences3463–3468

  14. 14 Journal

    Biessels, G. J., & Whitmer, R. A2020

    Cognitive dysfunction in diabetes: How to implement emerging guidelines

    Diabetologia3–9

  15. 15 Journal

    Xia, W., Luo, Y., Chen, Y. C., Chen, H., Ma, J., Yin, X., & Wang, S2020

    Glucose fluctuations are linked to disrupted brain functional architecture and cognitive impairment

    Journal of Alzheimer's Disease

  16. 16 Journal

    Parent, M. B., Krebs-Kraft, D. L., Ryan, J. P., Wilson, J. S., Harenski, C., & Hamann, S2011

    Glucose administration enhances fMRI brain activation and connectivity related to episodic memory encoding for neutral and emotional stimuli

    Neuropsychologia1052–1066

  17. 17 Meta

    Moran, C., Phan, T. G., & Srikanth, V. K2020

    Fuel for thought? A systematic review of neuroimaging studies into glucose enhancement of cognitive performance

    Neuropsychology Review1–28

  18. 18 Meta

    Gillespie, K. M., White, M. J., Kemps, E., Moore, H., Dymond, A., & Bartlett, S. E2023

    The impact of free and added sugars on cognitive function: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Nutrients

  19. 19 Journal

    Dye, L., Boyle, N. B., Champ, C., & Lawton, C2024

    Dynamic associations between glucose and ecological momentary cognition in type 1 diabetes

    npj Digital Medicine1746-024

  20. 20 Journal

    Dye, L., et al2025

    Dynamic relationships among continuous glucose metrics and momentary cognitive performance in diverse adults with type 1 diabetes

    Diabetes Care24-1834

  21. 21 Meta

    Lin, R., Gong, Y., Ma, G., Wang, C., & Wang, C2023

    Relationship between glycemic control and cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience

  22. 22 Journal

    Lamport, D. J., Saunders, C., Butler, L. T., & Spencer, J. P. E2014

    Fruits, vegetables, 100% juices, and cognitive function

    Nutrition Reviews774–789

  23. 23 Journal

    Lamport, D. J., et al2022

    The impact of glycaemic load on cognitive performance: A meta-analysis and guiding principles for future research

    Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

  24. 24 Journal

    Cooper, S. B., Bandelow, S., Nute, M. L., Morris, J. G., & Nevill, M. E2012

    Breakfast glycaemic index and cognitive function in adolescent school children

    British Journal of Nutrition1823–1832

  25. 25 Journal

    Ranglani, S., Manolopoulos, A., Wilding, J. P. H., & Bhatt, D. L2023

    Testing for associations between HbA1c levels, polygenic risk and brain health in UK Biobank (N = 39,283)

    Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism2932–2941

  26. 26 Journal

    Biessels, G. J., & Despa, F2018

    Cognitive decline and dementia in diabetes mellitus: Mechanisms and clinical implications

    Nature Reviews Endocrinology591–604

  27. 27 Journal

    Zhou, Y., Zhao, Y., Kendig, M. D., Manning, E. E., Jones, N. M., & Morris, M. J2022

    Association between type 2 diabetes mellitus and brain atrophy: A meta-analysis

    Diabetes & Metabolism Journal726–735

  28. 28 Cohort

    Mosconi, L., Rahman, A., Diaz, I., Wu, X., Scheyer, O., Hristov, H. W., Vallabhajosula, S., Isaacson, R. S., de Leon, M. J., & Brinton, R. D2021

    Prediabetes is associated with brain hypometabolism and cognitive decline in a sex-dependent manner: A longitudinal study of nondemented older adults

    Frontiers in Neurology

  29. 29 Cohort

    Crane, P. K., Walker, R., & Larson, E. B2018

    Diabetes, HbA1c, and cognitive decline: The English Longitudinal Study of Ageing

    Diabetologia33–43

  30. 30 Meta

    Hu, Z., Chen, M., Zhang, Y., Sun, X., Liu, J., Wang, Y., Zhang, H., & Yin, C2024

    Association of sugar consumption with risk of depression and anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Frontiers in Nutrition

  31. 31 Journal

    Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience editorial team2023

    Glycemic variability correlates with medial temporal lobe atrophy and decreased cognitive performance in patients with memory deficits

    Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience

  32. 32 Meta

    Gonzales, P. N. G., Ampil, E. R., Catindig-Dela Rosa, J. A., Villaraza, S. G., & Joson, M. L. C2024

    Increased risk of Alzheimer's disease with glycemic variability: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Cureus

  33. 33 Journal

    Pijnenburg, J., Nieuwenhuizen, A. G., & van Rossum, E. F. C2021

    Metabolic syndrome and cognitive performance across the adult lifespan

    PLOS ONE

  34. 34 Journal

    Cunnane, S. C., Trushina, E., Morland, C., Prigione, A., Casadesus, G., Andrews, Z. B., Beal, M. F., Bergersen, L. H., Brinton, R. D., et al2020

    Brain energy rescue: An emerging therapeutic concept for neurodegenerative disorders of ageing

    Nature Reviews Drug Discovery609–633

  35. 35 Meta

    Seidler, A. L., et al2019

    Comparative effect of low-glycemic index versus high-glycemic index breakfasts on cognitive function: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Nutrients

  36. 36 Journal

    Whyte, A. R., Rahman, S., Bell, L., Edirisinghe, I., Krikorian, R., Williams, C. M., & Shukitt-Hale, B2019

    Flavonoid-rich mixed berries maintain and improve cognitive function over a 6-hour period in young healthy adults

    Nutrients

  37. 37 Meta

    Wang, X. Q., Liu, Y., Chen, Y., Zhang, W., Dong, Y., Zhang, F., Lu, W., & Wu, M2024

    The impact of exercise training on the brain and cognition in type 2 diabetes and its physiological mediators: A systematic review

    Frontiers in Physiology

  38. 38 Journal

    Ma, X., Liu, Y., Li, M., Jiang, W., & Bi, F2022

    Dietary fiber intake is positively related with cognitive function in US older adults

    Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging107–115

  39. 39 Journal

    Rao, R. V., Subramaniam, K. G., Gregory, J., Bhatt, D. L., Bhatt, A., Bhatt, V., & Bhatt, Z2024

    Brain responses to intermittent fasting and the healthy living diet in older adults

    Cell Metabolism1266–1281

  40. 40 Journal

    Lowden, A., Moreno, C. R. C., Holmback, U., & Åkerstedt, T2024

    The effect of meal frequency and glycemic index during the night shift on alertness, hunger, and gastrointestinal complaints in female health care workers

    Journal of Nutrition3297–3306

  41. 41 Journal

    Kleinridders, A., Pothos, E. N., & Bhatt, D. L2022

    Brain insulin resistance and cognitive function: Influence of exercise

    Journal of Applied Physiology1583–1594

  42. 42 Journal

    Biessels, G. J., Strachan, M. W. J., Visseren, F. L. J., Kappelle, L. J., & Whitmer, R. A2014

    Dementia and cognitive decline in type 2 diabetes and prediabetic stages: Towards targeted interventions

    Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology8587(13) · 246–255

  43. 43 Journal

    Frontiers in Endocrinology2023

    Cognitive dysfunction in diabetes: Abnormal glucose metabolic regulation in the brain

    Frontiers in Endocrinology

  44. 44 Journal

    Frontiers in Neuroscience2020

    Inflamm-aging and brain insulin resistance: New insights and role of life-style strategies on cognitive and social determinants in aging and neurodegeneration

    Frontiers in Neuroscience

  45. 45 Journal

    Vanhanen, M., Koivisto, K., Moilanen, L., Helkala, E.-L., Hänninen, T., Soininen, H., Kervinen, K., Kesäniemi, Y. A., Laakso, M., & Kuusisto, J2006

    Association of metabolic syndrome with Alzheimer disease: A population-based study

    Neurology843–847

  46. 46 Review

    Arshad, M. S., Saeed, F., & Bhatt, D. L2025

    Role of dietary carbohydrates in cognitive function: A review

    Food Science & Nutrition

  47. 47 Journal

    Global Burden of Disease SSB Collaborators2025

    Global burden of high sugar-sweetened beverage consumption among young adults: 1990–2021

    Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome1990–2021

Keep reading

More from the Science Deep Dives

High-Performance Insights

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *