HPC · Science Deep Dive 6 April 2026 · revised 2026-04-06

The Psychology of Self-Sabotage: Why You Undermine What You Want Most.

Self-sabotage is not a character flaw. It is a biologically conserved threat-management strategy that can be decoded, interrupted, and redirected once you understand the neural loop that drives it. Here is what the science actually says, and what to do with it.

Section: Identity & Inner Game
Reading time: 22 min read
Sources: 47 · reviewed

01The 1978 Handicap

Torpedoing the Promotion You Worked Weeks to Earn

The person who torpedoes their own promotion is not a mystery to anyone except themselves. They prepared for weeks. They knew the stakes. And then, three days before the presentation, they picked a fight with a colleague, stayed up until 2 a.m. reorganising files that did not need reorganising, and walked into the room under-slept, under-rehearsed, and privately certain they had been found out. The outcome confirmed what they already believed: that success was for other people. The cycle closed without anyone noticing it had opened.[1][2]

This is self-sabotage, and the first thing to understand about it is that it is not random. It is not laziness, poor discipline, or a failure of willpower. It is the output of a neural system doing exactly what it was designed to do: managing threat at the expense of opportunity.[3][34] The brain treats the prospect of failure (public failure, identity-threatening failure) the same way it treats a physical danger. It avoids. And the avoidance feels, in the moment, like relief.[27]

The scale of the phenomenon makes the individual framing even more misleading. Piers Steel's landmark meta-analysis of 691 correlations found that roughly 20% of adults qualify as chronic procrastinators, while 80–95% of university students report procrastinating at significant levels.[1] A 2025 meta-analysis spanning 88 studies and 63,323 participants across 17 countries found a combined correlation of r = 0.342 between procrastination and negative emotional states: depression, anxiety, and stress marching in formation with the behaviour most people dismiss as a scheduling problem.[35]

01 · The history

The deeper misconception is that self-sabotage is about the task. It is not. Berglas and Jones's original experiments revealed that people self-handicap most when success feels uncontrollable, when they cannot attribute a good outcome to their own ability.[21][37] The behaviour makes perfect sense once you see the underlying logic: if I create an obstacle, then failure is explained by the obstacle, and my core self-concept remains untested. The threat is not the task. The threat is what the task might reveal.[26]

That insight maps directly onto what behavioural geneticists found thirty-six years later. Gustavson and colleagues' twin study demonstrated that procrastination is 46% heritable and shares its entire genetic variance with impulsivity (genetic correlation of r = 1.0).[2] The traits are not merely related; at the genetic level, they are the same trait expressed in different temporal contexts. Impulsivity is grabbing the wrong thing now. Procrastination is avoiding the right thing now. Both reflect a failure of goal-management ability, the executive function that keeps long-term objectives in view while resisting immediate emotional pulls.[2]

02The Mechanism

The Neural Loop That Keeps You Stuck

The mechanism begins in the amygdala, and it begins fast. When you encounter a task that carries the possibility of self-relevant failure (a performance review, a creative project, an honest conversation) the amygdala's threat-detection circuitry fires before the cortex has time to evaluate the actual risk.[3][9] Schlüter and colleagues' neuroimaging study of 264 healthy adults found that individuals who struggle with action initiation tend to have larger amygdala volumes, and, critically, the functional connectivity between their amygdala and the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) is weaker.[3] The dACC is a top-down regulation hub. When the bridge between threat detection and self-regulation is compromised, the threat signal wins.

Zhang and colleagues' fMRI task study mapped the downstream pathways with unusual precision.[9] They found two competing neural routes governing whether a person acts or avoids. When a task feels aversive, the anterior insula (the brain's disgust and pain-processing centre) lights up, and the signal travels through an amygdala-insula pathway that promotes procrastination. When a task carries high outcome value, the caudate nucleus activates, and a hippocampus-caudate pathway promotes action. Self-sabotage occurs when the aversion pathway overwhelms the value pathway.[9][11]

That matters because the system is not broken. It is doing cost-benefit analysis at a speed and scale that conscious reasoning cannot match. The problem is that the costs it weighs (shame, exposure, identity threat) are emotional, not practical. And the benefits it discounts (career progress, health, connection) are distant.

The self-sabotage loop: amygdala threat detection outpaces dACC regulation when their connectivity is weak; avoidance delivers short-term mood repair and is reinforced; the default mode network converts the failure into identity; on re-exposure the insula re-encodes the task as more aversive, each cycle tightening the lock.

Diagram · HPC

The second stage is the avoidance itself: what Pychyl and Sirois call short-term mood repair.[27][34] When the threat signal fires, the brain reaches for whatever will reduce the aversive feeling fastest. Scrolling. Reorganising. Cleaning. Starting a different, lower-stakes task. The critical insight is that procrastination works, briefly. It does reduce negative affect in the moment.[34] That is why the behaviour persists despite its obvious costs. The brain is not failing to learn. It is learning the wrong lesson: avoidance equals relief.

Wang and colleagues' resting-state fMRI study of 312 participants demonstrated that trait anxiety amplifies this loop by increasing the dynamic connectivity variability between the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex.[10] In plainer terms, anxious individuals have noisier communication between the brain's memory system and its planning system. Self-control signals get lost in the static. The more anxious you are, the harder it is for goal-relevant information to stay online long enough to override the avoidance impulse.[10]

A parallel pathway runs through punishment sensitivity. Dong and colleagues found that in 268 participants, punishment sensitivity completely mediated the relationship between caudate–frontal connectivity and procrastination.[11] People who are more attuned to negative outcomes, who feel losses more acutely, have weaker communication between the reward-processing and action-planning systems. The penalty signal drowns out the reward signal.

03Evidence

The 5 Strongest Studies on Self-Sabotage Psychology

01The claim

The single load-bearing finding

The hero study finds 691 correlations.

Not all evidence is created equal, and the self-sabotage literature spans everything from tightly controlled neuroimaging to self-report surveys of undergraduate psychology students. Ranking the evidence matters because it separates what we genuinely know from what we merely suspect. In a field as prone to pop-psychology distortion as self-sabotage, that distinction is not academic.[1] The five studies ranked below were selected for design quality, measurement precision, causal clarity, replication value, and field influence. A meta-analysis of 691 correlations outranks a cross-sectional surv

Pooled estimate

691

02How we measured

Ranking the self-sabotage evidence

Studies scored on design, sample, rigour, causality, replication.

Because procrastination is a regulatory failure driven by emotion rather than task difficulty, causality is the hard part: correlational designs cannot separate avoidance from the anxiety that causes it, so only neuroimaging and twin-study designs carry real weight.

Rubric weights

Design/35

Sample/20

Rigour/15

Causality/15

Replication/15

03The spread

Heterogeneity across 5 studies

Effect sizes across the ranked studies.

The convergence across these five studies is more persuasive than any individual finding. Steel's meta-analysis tells you what drives procrastination at the behavioural level. Schlüter's neuroimaging tells you where those drivers are instantiated in the brain. Sirois and Pychyl's longitudinal work tells you what procrastination costs over time. Gustavson's twin data tell you how much of the variance is genetic. And Sirois's self-compassion research tells you where the therapeutic leverage is.[1][3][4][2][5] The self-handicapping literature adds a complementary angle. A meta-analysis of 36 stu

Spread

88 → 71 /100

Range of point estimates across ranked studies.

04What does not hold

Negative knowledge

What the evidence base does not support.

Badagliacca and colleagues added a longitudinal dimension to the identity question. Their 2024 study found that guilt over success and impostor phenomenon predict self-handicapping and submissive behaviour over time. People who feel fraudulent do not merely avoid tasks; they systematically underperform to maintain coherence between their self-concept and their outcomes.[26] The loop is not just neural. It is narrative. The person is telling themselves a story, and the story demands a particular ending. The evolutionary frame offers one more layer. Chen and Chang pr

Consumer dose

The studies

5 trials. One pooled answer.

Below: the anchor study in full; then the forest plot at scale; then the supporting trials in ranked order.

01Anchor

. The Nature of Procrastination: A Meta-Analytic and Theoretical Review of Quintessential Self-Regulatory Failure

Steel 2007 Meta-Analysis · Integrative Theory · Foundational

Steel's meta-analysis is the most comprehensive empirical map of procrastination ever assembled. It synthesised 691 correlations to establish that procrastination is driven by task aversiveness, low self-efficacy, and impulsiveness, not by neuroticism, rebelliousness, or sensation-seeking. **The stu

Rubric breakdown

Design27/35

Sample18/20

Rigour13/15

Causality12/15

Replication9/10

Citations9/10

Total 88/100

The strongest studies, ranked by methodological weight.

Each scored 0–100 against a six-criterion rubric, tagged by design and year; the anchor leads.

Anchor (Rank 1) Supporting

Rank Authors & title Journal · Year Finding Score

Schlüter

. The Structural and Functional Signature of Action Control

· 2018

Individuals who struggle to initiate action tend to have larger amygdala volumes, and amygdala–dACC functional connectivity is negatively associated with action orientation. The weaker the bridge between threat detection and self-regulation, the harder it is to start.

79/100

Sirois & Stride

. Procrastination and Health: A Longitudinal Test of the Roles of Stress and Health Behaviours

· 2023

Path analysis confirmed that procrastination leads to increased stress, which in turn leads to poorer health, and this chain holds after controlling for conscientiousness and neuroticism.

76/100

Gustavson

. Genetic Relations Among Procrastination, Impulsivity, and Goal-Management Ability

· 2014

Procrastination and impulsivity are moderately heritable (46% and 49%), with a genetic correlation of r = 1.0, completely shared at the genetic level. Goal-management ability accounts for most of this shared variance.

74/100

Sirois

. Procrastination and Stress: Exploring the Role of Self-Compassion

· 2014

Self-compassion fully mediated the procrastination–stress relationship across four independent samples (meta-analytic r = −0.38). The mechanism works by interrupting self-critical rumination, not by reducing task aversiveness.

71/100

04Stakes

Four systems that pay the price for chronic avoidance

Self-sabotage is not a victimless behaviour. The costs compound across mental health, physical health, career trajectory, and relationships, each domain feeding back into the loop.

01 System 01 · System 01

Mental Health

A meta-analysis of 88 studies (N = 63,323) found a combined correlation of r = 0.342 between procrastination and depression, anxiety, and stress.[35] Sirois and Pychyl's longitudinal mediation confirmed that stress is not merely co-occurring: it is the pathway through which procrastination damages mental health.[4] Chronic avoidance generates its own emotional weather system.

In practice

Perpetual low-grade dread; the undone task is always in the room, getting heavier with every hour you don't touch it

02 System 02 · System 02

Physical Health

The JAMA-published cohort of 3,525 Swedish university students found that a 1-SD increase in procrastination predicted significantly worse mental health, disabling pain, physical inactivity, loneliness, and economic difficulty at 9-month follow-up.[7] The body keeps a ledger the mind prefers not to read. Sirois also found procrastination independently associated with hypertension and cardiovascular disease vulnerability.[16]

3,525 The body keeps a ledger the mind prefers not to read.

In practice

Unexplained tiredness; a body that feels chronically behind schedule; sleep that doesn't restore

System 03 · System 03

Career & Financial

Nguyen, Steel, and Ferrari found approximately $15,000 in salary reduction per 1-point increase on a 5-point procrastination scale.[18] Gamst-Klaussen and colleagues demonstrated that procrastination predicts lower retirement savings, late bill-paying, and impulse spending, fully mediated by financial self-efficacy.[19] The career cost of self-sabotage is not dramatic failure. It is the accumulation of unrealised potential.

15,000

In practice

Staying too long in situations that don't fit; missing inflection points when action would have changed the trajectory

04 System 04 · System 04

Relationships

Peel and Caltabiano identified defensiveness, trust difficulty, and lack of relationship skills as the three core factors of relationship sabotage.[31] Their subsequent work found a circular, not linear, model: insecure attachment drives sabotage, and sabotage reinforces the attachment style.[32] The loop runs in relationships the same way it runs in work: avoidance as protection, protection as damage.

In practice

Pulling away when closeness becomes available; engineering distance before rejection can arrive

05Protocol

A 4-Step Self-Sabotage Interruption Protocol

Each step targets a specific node in the neural loop. The goal is not to eliminate the threat signal (that is hardwired) but to change what happens between the signal and the avoidance response.

The protocol, as a sequence.

Before the task → Morning planning → During the task → After avoidance occurs

01 Step 01 · Before the task

Name the Emotion

Before any avoided task, write one sentence identifying the specific feeling behind the avoidance. Name the emotion, not the task.

Why

Self-compassion fully mediates the procrastination–stress link (r = −0.38 across 4 independent samples).[5] Affect labelling reduces amygdala reactivity by engaging prefrontal language circuits. Naming the threat weakens its grip.[5][34]

Before any avoided task, write one sentence identifying the specific feeling beh

Common mistake

Writing "I don't want to do this" instead of the actual feeling: "I'm afraid this will prove I'm not good enough." The label must be specific enough to be falsifiable.

02 Step 02 · Morning planning

Write the If-Then Plan

Construct a single implementation intention: "If [situation], then I will [action] at [time] in [place]."

Why

Gollwitzer and Sheeran's meta-analysis of 94 tests found d = 0.65 for goal attainment with implementation intentions in lab and structured field settings; effects for sustained repeated behaviours are more modest.[12] The mechanism automates action initiation, bypassing the deliberation stage where avoidance typically wins.

Construct a single implementation intention: "If [situation], then I will [actio

Common mistake

Setting a goal instead of a plan: "I will exercise more" vs. "If it is Monday at 7 a.m., then I will put on shoes and walk to the end of the street."

03 Step 03 · During the task

Bundle the Dreaded with the Desired

Pair the aversive task with a specific pleasure available only during that task.

Why

Milkman and colleagues found temptation bundling increased gym visits by 51%, and 61% of participants were willing to pay to restrict their desired content to the exercise setting only.[13] The technique changes the hedonic valence of the avoided task at the insula level.

Pair the aversive task with a specific pleasure available only during that task.

Common mistake

Using entertainment that competes with cognitive load. Podcasts and audiobooks work for physical tasks; social media does not work for anything.

04 Step 04 · After avoidance occurs

Reframe Identity, Not Outcomes

Replace "I'm a procrastinator" with "I have been avoiding this because X, and that pattern can change."

Why

Brief growth mindset interventions significantly reduced behavioural self-handicapping among fixed-mindset students.[36] Identity lock-in (Stage 5 of the loop) is the most dangerous stage because it makes the loop invisible.[25] Process framing keeps the loop visible.

Replace "I'm a procrastinator" with "I have been avoiding this because X, and th

Common mistake

Positive affirmations that contradict existing evidence ("I am confident and capable"), which amplify impostor phenomenon rather than reducing it. The reframe must acknowledge the pattern to change it.

Operational logic

The protocol is deliberately modest. It does not ask you to become more disciplined, more motivated, or fundamentally different. It asks you to intervene at four specific nodes in a loop that neuroscience has mapped with increasing precision.[3][9][10] The most effective therapeutic approach for procrastination is cognitive-behavioural therapy, which produces an effect size of g = 0.55, roughly double the overall treatment average of g = 0.34 across all modalities.[6] That is not because CBT is magic. It is because CBT targets the same regulatory systems this protocol addresses: the interpretation of threat, the automation of alternative responses, and the restructuring of identity narratives.

Geng and colleagues' randomised controlled trial of an 8-session mindfulness programme demonstrated large effect sizes for procrastination reduction and significant improvements in self-regulation and negative emotion reduction.[14] The science supports intervention. What it does not support is the assumption that knowing better should be sufficient. Knowing better is the starting condition, not the solution.

---

06Verdict

The verdict.

"The practical question is not 'Why do I keep doing this?' It is 'Where in the loop can I intervene before the next cycle completes?'" -- Editorial synthesis, HPC Science Deep Dive

Bottom line

The loop is not who you are. It is what the system defaults to when no one has shown it an alternative. Now someone has.

The most common misunderstanding about self-sabotage is that it requires an explanation at the level of biography. People search their childhoods for the origin story, their relationships for the trigger, their personality for the flaw. Elliot and Thrash demonstrated that fear of failure is intergenerationally transmitted: love withdrawal from parents predicts fear of failure in children.[20] But knowing the origin does not, by itself, change the circuit. The loop runs regardless of whether you understand where it started.

The whole argument, on one axis

Not all interventions are equal. CBT is double.

01Claim

Regulatory failure, not character defect

Self-sabotage is a measurable, heritable, neurally instantiated regulatory failure, driven by amygdala threat-detection overriding prefrontal goal-management. The brain is not lazy; it is protecting itself from perceived identity threat, at the cost of long-term outcomes.

02Consequence

Compound cost across four domains

Left unchecked, the loop compounds across mental health (r = 0.342 with depression/anxiety), physical health (cardiovascular vulnerability, sleep disruption), career trajectory (~$15,000 salary reduction per scale point), and relationships (circular sabotage reinforcing insecure attachment). Each domain feeds the next, tightening the loop with every cycle.

03Lever

Mechanism-level intervention

The protocol targets four specific nodes: emotion labelling to reduce amygdala reactivity, implementation intentions to automate action, temptation bundling to revalue tasks, and identity reframing to prevent consolidation. CBT produces g = 0.55. Intervention works when it addresses the circuit, not the character.

07Bibliography

47 sources · ~6h est. corpus read · 47 visible

Meta · 3 Review · 3 Cohort · 4 Journal · 36 Book · 1

Type

Sort

01 Review

Steel, P2007

The nature of procrastination: A meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure

Psychological Bulletin, 13365–94

doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.65
02 Journal

Gustavson, D. E., Miyake, A., Hewitt, J. K., & Friedman, N. P2014

Genetic relations among procrastination, impulsivity, and goal-management ability: Implications for the evolutionary origin of procrastination

Psychological Science, 251178–1188

doi: 10.1177/0956797614526260
03 Journal

Schlüter, C., Fraenz, C., Pinnow, M., Friedrich, P., Güntürkün, O., & Genç, E2018

The structural and functional signature of action control

Psychological Science.

doi: 10.1177/0956797618779380
04 Cohort

Sirois, F. M., Stride, C. B., & Pychyl, T. A2023

Procrastination and health: A longitudinal test of the roles of stress and health behaviours

British Journal of Health Psychology, 28860–875

doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12658
05 Journal

Sirois, F. M2014

Procrastination and stress: Exploring the role of self-compassion

Self and Identity, 13128–145

doi: 10.1080/15298868.2013.763404
06 Meta

Svartdal, F., Pfuhl, G., Nordby, K., et al2018

Targeting procrastination using psychological treatments: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Frontiers in Psychology.

doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01588
07 Journal

Lund, C. S., Daukantaitė, D., Jutengren, G., Sörman, K., & Persson, J2023

Associations between procrastination and subsequent health outcomes among university students in Sweden

JAMA Network Open, 6

doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.49346
08 Journal

Zhang, S., Liu, P., & Feng, T2019

To do it now or later: The cognitive mechanisms and neural substrates underlying procrastination

WIREs Cognitive Science, 10

doi: 10.1002/wcs.1492
09 Journal

Zhang, S., Zhu, W., Hu, Y., Li, X., Li, B., & Feng, T2021

Outcome value and task aversiveness impact task procrastination through separate neural pathways

Cerebral Cortex, 313846–3856

doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhab053
10 Journal

Wang, Y., Shi, H., Liu, W., et al2022

The anxiety-specific hippocampus–prefrontal cortex pathways links to procrastination through self-control

Human Brain Mapping.

doi: 10.1002/hbm.25754
11 Journal

Dong, W., Luo, J., Huo, H., Seger, C. A., & Chen, Q2022

Frontostriatal functional connectivity underlies the association between punishment sensitivity and procrastination

Brain Sciences, 12

doi: 10.3390/brainsci12091163
12 Journal

Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P2006

Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes

Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 382601(06) · 69–119

doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38002-1
13 Journal

Milkman, K. L., Minson, J. A., & Volpp, K. G. M2014

Holding the Hunger Games hostage at the gym: An evaluation of temptation bundling

Management Science, 60283–299

doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2013.1784
14 Journal

Geng, J., Liu, M., Liang, Y., & Zheng, X2022

Mindfulness intervention for academic procrastination: A randomized control trial

Learning and Individual Differences, 101

doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102244
15 Cohort

Tice, D. M., & Baumeister, R. F1997

Longitudinal study of procrastination, performance, stress, and health: The costs and benefits of dawdling

Psychological Science, 8454–458

doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00460.x
16 Journal

Sirois, F. M2015

Is procrastination a vulnerability factor for hypertension and cardiovascular disease? *Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 38*(3), 578–589

Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 38578–589

doi: 10.1007/s10865-015-9629-2
17 Meta

Hill, V. M., Rebar, A. L., Ferguson, S. A., Shriane, A. E., & Vincent, G. E2022

Go to bed! A systematic review and meta-analysis of bedtime procrastination correlates and sleep outcomes

Sleep Medicine Reviews, 66

doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2022.101697
18 Journal

Nguyen, B., Steel, P., & Ferrari, J. R2013

Procrastination's impact in the workplace and the workplace's impact on procrastination

International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 21388–399

doi: 10.1111/ijsa.12048
19 Journal

Gamst-Klaussen, T., Steel, P., & Svartdal, F2019

Procrastination and personal finances: Exploring the roles of planning and financial self-efficacy

Frontiers in Psychology, 10

doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00775
20 Journal

Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M2004

The intergenerational transmission of fear of failure

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30957–971

doi: 10.1177/0146167203262024
21 Journal

Berglas, S., & Jones, E. E1978

Drug choice as a self-handicapping strategy in response to noncontingent success

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36405–417

doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.36.4.405
22 Journal

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L2000

Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being

American Psychologist, 5568–78

doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
23 Review

Bandura, A1977

Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change

Psychological Review, 84191–215

doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.84.2.191
24 Journal

Bandura, A1997

*Self-efficacy: The exercise of control.* W. H. Freeman.

Self-efficacy: The exercise of control.
25 Journal

Dweck, C. S2006

*Mindset: The new psychology of success.* Random House.

Mindset: The new psychology of success.
26 Journal

Badagliacca, R., Ferraro, R., Ruta, G., & Di Blasi, M2024

Guilt over success, impostor phenomenon, and self-sabotaging behaviors

Current Psychology, 439081–1909

doi: 10.1007/s12144-024-05697-z
27 Book

Pychyl, T. A., & Sirois, F. M2016

Procrastination, emotion regulation, and well-being. In F. M. Sirois & T. A. Pychyl (Eds.), *Procrastination, health, and well-being* (pp. 163–188). Academic Press.

Procrastination, health, and well-being163–188
28 Journal

Gustavson, D. E., du Pont, A., Hatoum, A. S., et al2017

Genetic and environmental associations between procrastination and internalizing/externalizing psychopathology

Clinical Psychological Science, 6264–278

doi: 10.1177/2167702617706084
29 Journal

Chen, B.-B., & Chang, L2016

Procrastination as a fast life history strategy

Evolutionary Psychology, 14

doi: 10.1177/1474704916630314
30 Journal

Beutel, M. E., Klein, E. M., Aufenanger, S., et al2016

Procrastination, distress and life satisfaction across the age range – A German representative community study

PLOS ONE.

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148054
31 Journal

Peel, R., & Caltabiano, N2021

The relationship sabotage scale: An evaluation of factor analyses and constructive validity

BMC Psychology.0359-021

doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00644-0
32 Journal

Peel, R., et al2025

The theory of relationship sabotage: A preliminary evaluation of conceptual models expanding on attachment and goal-orientation frameworks

Behavioral Sciences, 15

doi: 10.3390/bs15081091
33 Journal

Sansone, R. A., Wiederman, M. W., & McLean, J. S2008

The relationship between medically self-sabotaging behaviors and borderline personality disorder among psychiatric inpatients

Primary Care Companion to the Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 10448–452
34 Journal

Sirois, F. M., & Pychyl, T. A2013

Procrastination and the priority of short-term mood regulation: Consequences for future self

Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7115–127

doi: 10.1111/spc3.12011
35 Meta

[Author et al.]2025

The association between procrastination and negative emotions in healthy individuals: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Frontiers in Psychiatry.

doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1624094
36 Journal

[Author et al.]2022

Promoting a growth mindset decreases behavioral self-handicapping among students who are on the fixed side of the mindset continuum

Frontiers in Psychology.
37 Journal

Jones, E. E., & Berglas, S1978

Control of attributions about the self through self-handicapping strategies: The appeal of alcohol and the role of underachievement

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4200–206

doi: 10.1177/014616727800400205
38 Review

Sirois, F. M2023

Procrastination and stress: A conceptual review of why context matters

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20

doi: 10.3390/ijerph20065031
39 Cohort

Lund, C. S., et al2024

Trajectories of procrastination among Swedish university students over one academic year: A cohort study

BMC Psychology.0359-024

doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02072-2
40 Journal

Dweck, C. S2019

Mindsets: A view from two eras

Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14481–496

doi: 10.1177/1745691618804166
41 Journal

Sirois, F. M2013

Out of sight, out of time? A meta-analytic investigation of procrastination and time perspective

European Journal of Personality.
42 Cohort

[Author et al.]2024

Procrastination, depression and anxiety symptoms in university students: A three-wave longitudinal study on the mediating role of perceived stress

BMC Psychology.0359-024

doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01761-2
43 Journal

[Author et al.]2023

Academic procrastination, loneliness, and academic anxiety as predictors of suicidality among university students. PMID: 38797963.
44 Journal

Hill, V. M., et al2024

The association between bedtime procrastination and sleep outcomes. PMC11059092.
45 Journal

Schwinger, M., et al2014

Academic self-handicapping and achievement: A meta-analysis. 36 field studies, N = 25,550.
46 Journal

0
47 Journal

[Author et al.]2025

Procrastination in personal finance: Implications for estate planning and retirement satisfaction

ScienceDirect.

doi: 10.1016/j.jbef.2025.101182

The Psychology of Self-Sabotage: Why You Undermine What You Want Most.

Torpedoing the Promotion You Worked Weeks to Earn

The Neural Loop That Keeps You Stuck