Skip to content after assessment

Assessment loading

If the interactive assessment does not start, you can still read the methodology and evidence below, then try again later.

Browse all assessments

Where Your Burnout Risk Profile Sits

Burnout Spectrum Assessment

Where Your Burnout Risk Profile Sits

A 20-scenario self-report that groups your selected answer points across five editorial dimensions. It is not a validated measure of an underlying trait.

20 scenarios5 groups4 forced choicesno neutral option

Topic context from the cited source; it does not validate this questionnaire or its score thresholds.

— Oosterholt et al. (2015)

What your answers coverEmotional ExhaustionWhether work leaves you feeling drained rather than restored.DepersonalisationWhether you engage with colleagues warmly or keep them at arm's length.Personal EfficacyHow confident you feel in your own competence and achievements at work.Physical DepletionWhether you protect sleep, food and movement even under work pressure.CynicismWhether you still find meaning and effort worthwhile in your daily work.

Burnout Test: Where Are You on the Burnout Spectrum Right Now?

Twenty forced-choice scenarios are summed into editorial answer-score bands; the result does not diagnose or measure an underlying trait.

~8-10 min · Item answers and results stay on this device · Share links and invite cards carry no scores

Answer for how the last month has actually felt, not how you push through on a good day — an honest read here is the kindest one.

A structured self-reflection — not a diagnostic.

This assessment is a structured self-reflection tool and educational resource — it is not a validated diagnostic and is not a substitute for clinical evaluation. Every dimension insight references peer-reviewed literature for educational context only. If you have concerns about your health, consult a qualified professional. Self-report instruments of this kind have no validated retest interval; the four-to-six-week Second Reading is a sensible practice, not a clinical standard.

Welcome back — you have a profile in progress.

Your profile

0 / —

Profile

Dimension profile

The Reading

Strongest dimension

Learn more →

Open the full dossier

Dimension log

This assessment is a structured self-reflection tool and educational resource — it is not a validated diagnostic and is not a substitute for clinical evaluation. Every dimension insight references peer-reviewed literature for educational context only. If you have concerns about your health, consult a qualified professional.

Your answers

Burnout Test: Where Are You on the Burnout Spectrum Right Now?

This literature-informed structured self-reflection adds up what you select about emotional exhaustion, distance from colleagues, sense of accomplishment, physical depletion, and cynicism toward work. It cannot describe burnout, and it does not predict what would happen if something changed.

Interactive scoring requires JavaScript. You can still read every question and answer option below.

After a demanding workday, what does a typical evening look like for you?
- Rarely achieve genuine rest — work runs in my mind until bedtime
- Most evenings dominated by work thoughts; rest is hard to reach
- I wind down most evenings but often take an hour or more to let go
- I switch off fairly cleanly and genuinely decompress most evenings
On non-working days, how effectively do you genuinely restore your emotional energy?
- Non-work days provide little real restoration — I start most weeks already depleted
- Non-work time feels insufficient — rarely genuinely recharged by Monday
- Usually some restoration, but I'm sometimes still depleted by Monday
- Non-work days reliably leave me feeling restored and ready
When your workload intensifies significantly, which of these best describes how you actually respond?
- I don't believe in easing off just because things get demanding — showing up and pushing through no matter what is what the moment calls for
- I absorb demand without actively managing my response and feel it afterward
- I push through but try to pace myself, with uneven success
- I quietly adjust my pace and protect some capacity through the surge, even if it's not obvious to anyone else
As you approach a new working week, how much emotional energy do you typically feel you have available?
- Routinely begin weeks already depleted — real reserve is largely absent
- Starting most weeks already tired; a demanding week feels like a stretch
- Adequate but not abundant — enough for a normal week without much cushion
- I feel genuinely ready with real reserves to draw on
When a colleague or team member brings you a problem or difficulty, what is your typical first instinct?
- Keep interactions as brief and transactional as possible
- Deal with it efficiently — focus on resolution over the person
- Willing to help, though I need to consciously engage when stretched
- Genuine curiosity and interest in helping with what they face
During a significant work interaction requiring genuine attention — a difficult meeting, a colleague under pressure — how emotionally present are you?
- Emotionally flat in most interactions — the human dimension rarely comes through
- Often go through the motions while feeling internally distant
- Mostly present, but notice moments of detachment or going through the motions
- Fully present and tuned in to the human dimension of the interaction
How do you typically experience your relationships with the people you work closely with?
- Largely as obligations to manage — the relational aspects of work feel depleting
- Mostly as a source of demand; genuine investment feels harder than it used to
- Positive but increasingly functional — I maintain them without actively investing
- As genuine, energising connections I value and invest in
When a colleague or client is frustrated or difficult, which of these best captures your natural response?
- I keep my emotional distance on purpose — I don't let other people's frustration get to me, so I stay a step removed
- Irritability is the main internal response; maintaining perspective is difficult
- Manage my response professionally, but find it harder than it used to be — the patience required feels like more effort
- I stay curious about what's actually going on for the other person — usually without much effort
When a piece of work does not go as planned, how do you typically interpret what happened?
- Frequently interpret them as evidence I am not suited to the demands of my role
- Tend to interpret them broadly — as evidence of a capability gap — and confidence takes time to recover
- Momentary doubt in my approach, but I recover my confidence reasonably quickly
- I identify what I can learn or adjust without broadly questioning my competence
Before starting a substantial new project or challenge, which of these best matches your honest internal script?
- I try to stay humble about it — assuming I might come up short feels more honest than assuming I'll succeed
- Often uncertain whether I have what it currently takes; anticipate struggling
- Some apprehension, but I trust I will find my footing as I engage
- I don't dwell on how confident I feel — I draw on what's worked before and start
After completing a significant piece of work, how do you typically feel about your own contribution?
- Consistently feel my contribution was inadequate regardless of the actual outcome
- Rarely feel a genuine sense of achievement, even when the result is clearly good
- Acknowledge the outcome but tend to underestimate or quickly dismiss my contribution
- Can identify specific things I did well and feel a genuine sense of accomplishment
How well do your current skills and capacity match what your role is now demanding of you?
- Persistently feel I am not equipped for what my role requires — a gap I cannot seem to close
- Frequently feel the demands have outgrown what I can reliably deliver
- Mostly adequate, though certain demands stretch me and highlight specific gaps
- Generally feel my skills are a good match for what is currently required
During demanding work periods, which of these best describes what actually happens with your sleep?
- I run lean on sleep when it's busy — I've always been able to push through on less, and I don't see the need to protect it religiously
- Sleep conditions — timing, wind-down, and environment — are often the first thing dropped when work pressure builds; most demanding stretches are poorly protected
- Usually manage good sleep conditions but let them slide when work pressure intensifies
- I protect the conditions for sleep as a fixed part of how I work, even though it's rarely something I'd mention
Between intense work periods, how deliberately do you protect physical recovery before the next demands arrive?
- Rarely manage meaningful recovery — demanding periods follow each other with almost no physical rest buffer
- Recovery is often interrupted or too brief; the next cycle starts before real recovery is achieved
- Usually manage some recovery, though it is rarely complete before the next cycle begins
- I consistently protect real physical recovery between demanding periods
During high-demand work periods, how consistently do you protect deliberate physical self-care — movement and adequate nutrition?
- Routinely skip meals and movement during demanding stretches — physical self-care barely registers
- Physical self-care is consistently the first thing I sacrifice when work intensifies
- Maintain the basics most of the time, though one or two often slip
- I protect physical self-care habits even during demanding periods
How actively do you manage your working pace to avoid consistently operating at or beyond your physical limits?
- Virtually never pace — consistently operate at maximum output regardless of physical impact
- Rarely manage to pace effectively; consistently push to or beyond my limits during surges
- Try to pace myself but often absorb more than intended during busy periods
- I actively monitor my load and pace, protecting against sustained overextension
When a new initiative or project is introduced at work, what is your typical internal response?
- Dismiss it internally from the start — rarely find new initiatives worth genuine engagement
- Mentally note it as unlikely to deliver much, but comply and participate outwardly
- Cautiously open — wait to see whether it follows through before fully investing
- Open curiosity — interested in what it might achieve and what my part might be
When you set out on a typical piece of work, which of these best matches your honest approach to effort?
- I've stopped pretending everything deserves my best — I save real effort for what will actually be noticed or matter
- Rarely invest beyond the minimum; doing extra feels unrewarding or pointless
- Invest extra effort on meaningful tasks, but hold back on routine ones
- I tend to do things properly regardless of whether it will be noticed — it's more habit than decision
How do you typically respond to decisions or constraints imposed from outside your control — by leadership, clients, a board, or anyone you answer to — that affect your work?
- Approach most decisions with the expectation they will be wrong, harmful, or pointless
- Find most decisions frustrating or misaligned; constructive engagement is hard
- Generally accept them and work within them, but privately question many
- Engage with them constructively, even when I disagree with some
How often do you notice moments in your workday where what you are doing feels genuinely worthwhile?
- Almost never — the sense that work is worthwhile has largely disappeared
- Rarely — genuine meaning is very hard to find on most workdays
- Occasionally — meaningful moments surface, but they are hard to find on most workdays
- Regularly — genuine meaning or purpose surfaces most workdays

Appendix · Method & evidence Arena · Case file

How this instrument works

This is a 20-item structured self-assessment of your burnout risk profile, read across 5 dimensions: Emotional Exhaustion; Depersonalisation; Personal Efficacy; Physical Depletion; and Cynicism. Each item is a concrete scenario with four forced-choice responses — no neutral midpoint, so every answer commits to a direction — and response order is shuffled on every run to vary position; this implementation has not been tested for bias reduction. 5 of the 20 items are reverse-keyed — the attractive-sounding response is the structurally weak one — with wording intended to challenge socially desirable framing; this design has not been tested for bias reduction.

Scoring combines an overall reading with a per-dimension profile. Cascade flags compare configured dimension totals with editorial thresholds. They do not establish a compound risk and may not reflect the item-level pattern. The result bands are editorial guidance, not clinical thresholds: they organise the reading, they do not describe.

Every dimension insight cites peer-reviewed literature, and most answer reveals do — 6 sources back this instrument, each with DOI metadata supplied at build time; source relevance and claim interpretation remain editorial judgments. Compiled by the High Performance Culture editorial team. Instrument v1.1 · August 2026.

Read the full assessment methodology →

Items: 20
Dimensions: 5
Format: Forced choice, 4 options
Sources: 6
Instrument: v1.1 · August 2026

The 5 editorial answer groups

Emotional Exhaustion

Strength here looks like evening decompression reliably achieved and non-work days genuinely restorative — emotional resources are replenished between demand cycles before the next begins.

The vulnerable pattern: carrying the emotional demands of work into recovery time, preventing replenishment and allowing exhaustion to compound progressively across cycles.

Sample itemAfter a demanding workday, what does a typical evening look like for you?

First structural move: Build one consistent transition ritual tonight — a physical action that signals you have stopped working. Even five minutes of something explicitly non-work before your evening starts creates the psychological boundary that decompression requires.

Go deeperProtocol: The Emotional Agility Protocol →Glossary: Allostatic load →

Depersonalisation

Strength here looks like maintaining genuine curiosity and emotional presence in work interactions — experiencing relationships with colleagues as connecting rather than depleting.

The vulnerable pattern: protective emotional distancing from colleagues and clients, shifting from genuine engagement to functional, transactional contact as interpersonal resources are overdrawn.

Sample itemWhen a colleague or team member brings you a problem or difficulty, what is your typical first instinct?

First structural move: In the next significant work interaction, ask one genuine question you do not already know the answer to. Curiosity — even momentary — is the opposite of the protective distancing pattern, and it interrupts the drift toward purely functional contact.

Go deeperGlossary: Compassion fatigue →Glossary: Empathy →

Personal Efficacy

Strength here looks like treating setbacks as specific and bounded, approaching new work with calibrated confidence, and allowing genuine accomplishment to register from completed work.

The vulnerable pattern: interpreting setbacks as evidence of broad incapacity and approaching new demands with anticipatory doubt — the gradual erosion of the felt sense of professional effectiveness.

Sample itemWhen a piece of work does not go as planned, how do you typically interpret what happened?

First structural move: After today's most challenging task, write one specific thing you handled well — not 'worked hard,' but something concrete. Specificity in self-assessment is what rebuilds the felt sense of competence that exhaustion erodes.

Go deeperProtocol: The Confidence Protocol →Deep dive: The Science of Confidence →Glossary: Self-efficacy →

Physical Depletion

Strength here looks like actively protecting sleep conditions, physical self-care, and genuine recovery between demanding periods — maintaining the physiological foundation that performance and stress regulation depend on.

The vulnerable pattern: consistently sacrificing sleep and physical self-care under work pressure, progressively disrupting the physiological restoration that underpins both performance and resilience.

Sample itemDuring demanding work periods, which of these best describes what actually happens with your sleep?

First structural move: Identify the single sleep or physical self-care habit you most consistently sacrifice under work pressure and commit to protecting just that one this week. One consistently protected habit matters more than several incomplete intentions.

Go deeperProtocol: The Sleep Optimisation Protocol →Deep dive: The Science of Deep Sleep →Glossary: HPA axis →

Cynicism

Strength here looks like approaching new work with genuine curiosity, investing discretionary effort, and engaging constructively with organisational decisions — work retained as a source of meaning beyond obligation.

The vulnerable pattern: internal dismissal of new initiatives, withdrawal of discretionary effort, and progressive disillusionment with the work environment — the motivational signature of a chronic demand-resource imbalance.

Sample itemWhen a new initiative or project is introduced at work, what is your typical internal response?

First structural move: Take the initiative or task you are most sceptical about and write one genuine question you want answered before deciding how much to invest. Scepticism with a question is engagement; scepticism without one is withdrawal.

Go deeperGlossary: Psychological safety →Glossary: Intrinsic motivation →

Questions, answered

Is this a diagnosis?

No. This assessment is a structured self-reflection tool, not a validated clinical instrument. Its result bands are editorial guidance, not clinical thresholds — they organise your answers into a readable profile; they do not describe a condition. If you have concerns about your health or wellbeing, speak to a qualified professional.

How were the questions designed?

Each of the 20 items presents a concrete scenario with four graded responses and no neutral midpoint, so every answer commits to a lean. Items were authored against the peer-reviewed literature listed in the evidence file on this page, and citation metadata is supplied at build time; source relevance and claim interpretation remain editorial judgments. Response order is shuffled on every run to vary position; this implementation has not been tested for bias reduction.

What happens to my answers?

Assessment answers stay on this device. Unfinished progress expires after 30 days. A completed profile and optional comparison history remain until you delete local assessment data or clear browser data. If you opt into email, your email address is sent; item answers are not. If you share a result link, total and dimension scores are included in the URL and may appear in browser, server, CDN, or analytics logs.

How often should I retake it?

The instrument keeps your previous reading and sets the two side by side when you retake — the Second Reading. There is no validated retest interval; repeat only if a raw answer-point comparison would be useful, and do not treat it as confirmed underlying change.

Why bands instead of percentiles?

Because this assessment does not collect a population score set, there is no reader population to rank you against — and we will not invent one. The 5-dimension profile groups selected answer points for editorial display; it is not a validated structural or decision-utility model.

Where does the evidence come from?

Every dimension insight cites peer-reviewed research, and most answer reveals do — 6 sources stand behind this instrument, each with DOI metadata supplied at build time; source relevance and claim interpretation remain editorial judgments. A few reveals are straightforward editorial reasoning from the same evidence base and carry no citation by design. The full list, with DOIs, is in the evidence file below.

The evidence file

6 peer-reviewed sources stand behind this instrument's items and insights.

Maslach & Jackson (1981) — The measurement of experienced burnout. Journal of Organizational Behavior. DOI: 10.1002/job.4030020205 ✓ Crossref‑verified
Maslach & Leiter (2016) — Understanding the burnout experience: recent research and its implications for psychiatry. World Psychiatry. DOI: 10.1002/wps.20311 ✓ Crossref‑verified
Schaufeli & Bakker (2004) — Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior. DOI: 10.1002/job.248 ✓ Crossref‑verified
Ekstedt et al. (2009) — Sleep physiology in recovery from burnout. Biological Psychology. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.08.006 ✓ Crossref‑verified
Oosterholt et al. (2015) — Burnout and cortisol: Evidence for a lower cortisol awakening response in both clinical and non-clinical burnout. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.11.003 ✓ Crossref‑verified
Bes et al. (2023) — Organizational interventions and occupational burnout: a meta-analysis with focus on exhaustion. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health. DOI: 10.1007/s00420-023-02009-z ✓ Crossref‑verified

Arena Clutch Performance

Yips: Definition and the Sudden Loss of Fine-Motor Performance Under Pressure
June 17, 2026September 2, 2026 Arena, Clutch Performance

The yips is a psychoneuromuscular disorder of involuntary jerks or freezing in fine-motor sport tasks, affecting up to 54% of low-handicap golfers.

Dive Deeper Yips: Definition and the Sudden Loss of Fine-Motor Performance Under Pressure
Arena Crisis Management

Window of Tolerance: Siegel’s Definition and the Optimal Arousal Zone
June 18, 2026September 2, 2026 Arena, Crisis Management

Window of tolerance is the arousal bandwidth in which the nervous system can process and regulate emotion without tipping into panic or shutdown.

Dive Deeper Window of Tolerance: Siegel’s Definition and the Optimal Arousal Zone
Neuroscience of Discipline Habits & Behavioral Design

Willpower Test: How Strong Is Your Self-Control Architecture?
July 17, 2026August 24, 2026 Neuroscience of Discipline, Habits & Behavioral Design

A 20-scenario, evidence-based profile that maps five structural dimensions of your self-regulation – and reveals whether you are winning through habits and environment, or relying on effortful resistance, which the evidence suggests is the least durable self-control strategy.

Dive Deeper Willpower Test: How Strong Is Your Self-Control Architecture?
Vagus Nerve & Nervous System Regulation Brain Health & Bio-Performance

Vagal Tone Assessment: How Resilient Is Your Nervous System?
July 17, 2026August 24, 2026 Vagus Nerve & Nervous System Regulation, Brain Health & Bio-Performance

A 20-scenario, evidence-based assessment that maps how well your autonomic nervous system recovers from stress – identifying the specific habits, practices, and patterns that shape your vagal tone across five measurable dimensions.

Dive Deeper Vagal Tone Assessment: How Resilient Is Your Nervous System?
Trust Relationship Neuroscience

Trust Architecture Quiz: How Well Do You Build and Sustain Trust?
August 18, 2026August 24, 2026 Trust, Relationship Neuroscience

This evidence-based profile evaluates how you build and maintain trust across five behavioural dimensions: how you initiate trust through vulnerability, signal competence honestly, maintain a consistent track record, repair breaches when they occur, and calibrate how far and to whom you extend trust.

Dive Deeper Trust Architecture Quiz: How Well Do You Build and Sustain Trust?
Trading Psychology Arena

Trading Psychology: The Complete Guide to Emotional Discipline & Decision Quality
July 24, 2026September 2, 2026 Trading Psychology, Arena

You spent three months backtesting a strategy.

Dive Deeper Trading Psychology: The Complete Guide to Emotional Discipline & Decision Quality