Assessment loading
If the interactive assessment does not start, you can still read the methodology and evidence below, then try again later.
Trace Your Cognitive Fuel Habits to Review Meal by Meal
Your Cognitive Fuel Profile
Trace Your Cognitive Fuel Habits to Review Meal by Meal
Item answers and results stay on this device
A structured self-reflection, not a diagnostic.
A 20-scenario self-report that groups your selected answer points across five editorial dimensions. It is not a validated measure of an underlying trait.
Topic context from the cited source; it does not validate this questionnaire or its score thresholds.
Cognitive Fuel Assessment: What's Limiting Your Brain Performance?
Twenty forced-choice scenarios are summed into editorial answer-score bands; the result does not diagnose or measure an underlying trait.
~7-9 min · Item answers and results stay on this device · Links created by this assessment contain no scores
Answer for what you actually ate and drank this week, not your ideal routine — the honest version is the useful one.
This assessment is a structured self-reflection tool and educational resource — it is not a validated diagnostic and is not a substitute for clinical evaluation. Every dimension insight references peer-reviewed literature for educational context only. If you have concerns about your health, consult a qualified professional. Self-report instruments of this kind have no validated retest interval; the four-to-six-week Second Reading is a sensible practice, not a clinical standard.
Profile
Shape of the profile — severity reads from the verdict above.
Dimension profile
Second reading
Answers that stood out on their own
Your assessment summary
Open your assessment summary
Dimension log
This assessment is a structured self-reflection tool and educational resource — it is not a validated diagnostic and is not a substitute for clinical evaluation. Every dimension insight references peer-reviewed literature for educational context only. If you have concerns about your health, consult a qualified professional.
Your answers
How this instrument works
This is a 20-item structured self-assessment of your cognitive fuel habits to review, read across 5 dimensions: Dietary quality; Meal timing & glucose; Hydration habits; Micronutrient basics; and Stimulant management. Each item is a concrete scenario with four forced-choice responses — no neutral midpoint, so every answer commits to a direction — and response order is shuffled on every run to vary position; this implementation has not been tested for bias reduction. 5 of the 20 items are reverse-keyed — the attractive-sounding response is the structurally weak one — with wording intended to challenge socially desirable framing; this design has not been tested for bias reduction.
Scoring combines an overall reading with a per-dimension profile. Cascade flags compare configured dimension totals with editorial thresholds. They do not establish a compound risk and may not reflect the item-level pattern. The result bands are editorial guidance, not clinical thresholds: they organise the reading, they do not describe.
Every dimension insight cites peer-reviewed literature, and most answer reveals do — 9 sources back this instrument, each with DOI metadata supplied at build time; source relevance and claim interpretation remain editorial judgments. Compiled by the High Performance Culture editorial team. Instrument v1.1 · August 2026.
Read the full assessment methodology →
- Items
- 20
- Dimensions
- 5
- Format
- Forced choice, 4 options
- Sources
- 9
- Instrument
- v1.1 · August 2026
The 5 editorial answer groups
Dietary quality
Strength here looks like consistently eating a varied diet rich in vegetables, oily fish, whole grains, and legumes, with minimal ultra-processed food — the pattern of food choices most consistently associated with reduced cognitive risk in the research.
The vulnerable pattern: relying on ultra-processed food and a narrow range of plant foods, leaving the brain without the dietary variety that meta-analytic evidence links to brain-protective outcomes.
First structural move: If it fits your circumstances, add one additional vegetable or plant food to your largest meal each day this week and note how it feels. This questionnaire cannot predict what effect it would have for you.
Go deeperProtocol: The Cognitive Fuel Protocol →Glossary: Mediterranean diet →
Meal timing & glucose
Strength here looks like eating at consistent times, keeping evening meals low in refined carbohydrates, and avoiding frequent sugary snacks — habits that support the stable blood glucose patterns associated with better cognitive performance.
The vulnerable pattern: eating irregular meals, high-GI evening food, and frequent sugary snacks, creating the blood glucose variability that research links to impaired memory, processing speed, and executive function.
First structural move: If it is appropriate for you, anchor your first and last meals to fixed times today and swap your evening meal's largest refined carbohydrate for a lower-GI alternative, then note what you notice afterward. This questionnaire cannot measure your blood glucose or predict the result.
Go deeperProtocol: The Metabolic Reset Protocol →Glossary: Glycaemic index →
Hydration habits
Strength here looks like drinking water proactively and consistently through the day — before thirst arrives, during focused work, and maintaining pale urine — so cognitive performance is never limited by a fluid deficit.
The vulnerable pattern: relying on thirst as the primary hydration cue, forgetting to drink during focused work, and tolerating regular dehydration symptoms — allowing a mild deficit to persist unnoticed; the cited studies report reduced vigilance, working memory and mood at that level.
First structural move: Place a full water bottle at your workstation right now and commit to drinking proactively at three fixed points today — on waking, mid-morning, and mid-afternoon. This questionnaire cannot measure your hydration status or predict the result.
Go deeperGlossary: Cognitive load →
Micronutrient basics
Strength here looks like eating a varied diet across B-vitamin-rich food groups — animal or fortified foods, dark leafy greens, legumes, and whole grains — and supplementing thoughtfully where dietary supply is limited.
The vulnerable pattern: a restricted or monotonous diet with limited B12-rich foods or dark leafy greens, creating the background micronutrient shortfalls that quietly undermine the energy metabolism, neurotransmitter synthesis, and myelin maintenance the brain depends on.
First structural move: If it is appropriate for you, add one B-vitamin-rich food to today's meals — eggs, a handful of spinach, or a serving of lentils are the simplest entries. This questionnaire cannot measure a nutrient level and does not replace bloodwork or medical advice.
Go deeperProtocol: The Energy Systems Protocol →Glossary: ATP →
Stimulant management
Strength here looks like timing caffeine deliberately to support attention during peak cognitive demands, cutting off before the sleep-disruption window, and using it as a performance tool on a foundation of genuine alertness rather than as a functional baseline.
The vulnerable pattern: using caffeine continuously without timing strategy, extending intake into the evening, and relying on it to reach baseline function — a pattern that erodes sleep quality and progressively undermines the genuine cognitive recovery caffeine is compensating for.
First structural move: If it is appropriate for you, set a caffeine cut-off today and identify the single most cognitively demanding task in your day. This questionnaire cannot predict what effect any change would have for you.
Go deeperProtocol: The Sleep Optimisation Protocol →Deep dive: The Science of Deep Sleep →Glossary: Caffeine →
Questions, answered
Is this a diagnosis?
No. This assessment is a structured self-reflection tool, not a validated clinical instrument. Its result bands are editorial guidance, not clinical thresholds — they organise your answers into a readable profile; they do not describe a condition. If you have concerns about your health or wellbeing, speak to a qualified professional.
How were the questions designed?
Each of the 20 items presents a concrete scenario with four graded responses and no neutral midpoint, so every answer commits to a lean. Items were authored against the peer-reviewed literature listed in the evidence file on this page, and citation metadata is supplied at build time; source relevance and claim interpretation remain editorial judgments. Response order is shuffled on every run to vary position; this implementation has not been tested for bias reduction.
What happens to my answers?
Assessment answers stay on this device. Unfinished progress expires after 30 days. A completed profile and optional comparison history remain until you delete local assessment data or clear browser data. If you opt into email, your email address is sent; item answers are not. If you share a result link, total and dimension scores are included in the URL and may appear in browser, server, CDN, or analytics logs.
Can I share my result?
Links created by this assessment contain no scores. Older result URLs may contain total and dimension scores and can appear in browser history and server or CDN logs; avoid sharing them.
How often should I retake it?
The instrument keeps your previous reading and sets the two side by side when you retake — the Second Reading. There is no validated retest interval; repeat only if a raw answer-point comparison would be useful, and do not treat it as confirmed underlying change.
Why bands instead of percentiles?
Because this assessment does not collect a population score set, there is no reader population to rank you against — and we will not invent one. The 5-dimension profile groups selected answer points for editorial display; it is not a validated structural or decision-utility model.
Where does the evidence come from?
Every dimension insight cites peer-reviewed research, and most answer reveals do — 9 sources stand behind this instrument, each with DOI metadata supplied at build time; source relevance and claim interpretation remain editorial judgments. A few reveals are straightforward editorial reasoning from the same evidence base and carry no citation by design. The full list, with DOIs, is in the evidence file below.
The evidence file
9 peer-reviewed sources stand behind this instrument's items and insights.
- Fekete et al. (2025) — The role of the Mediterranean diet in reducing the risk of cognitive impairment, dementia, and Alzheimer's disease: a meta-analysis. GeroScience. DOI: 10.1007/s11357-024-01488-3 ✓ Crossref‑verified
- Mortby et al. (2013) — High "Normal" Blood Glucose Is Associated with Decreased Brain Volume and Cognitive Performance in the 60s: The PATH through Life Study. PLoS ONE. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073697 ✓ Crossref‑verified
- Lamport et al. (2011) — Evidence for a second meal cognitive effect: glycaemic responses to high and low glycaemic index evening meals are associated with cognition the following morning. Nutritional Neuroscience. DOI: 10.1179/1476830511y.0000000002 ✓ Crossref‑verified
- Ganio et al. (2011) — Mild dehydration impairs cognitive performance and mood of men. British Journal of Nutrition. DOI: 10.1017/s0007114511002005 ✓ Crossref‑verified
- Kennedy (2016) — B Vitamins and the Brain: Mechanisms, Dose and Efficacy—A Review. Nutrients. DOI: 10.3390/nu8020068 ✓ Crossref‑verified
- Kløve & Petersen (2025) — A systematic review and meta-analysis of the acute effect of caffeine on attention. Psychopharmacology. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-025-06775-1 ✓ Crossref‑verified
- Drake et al. (2013) — Caffeine Effects on Sleep Taken 0, 3, or 6 Hours before Going to Bed. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine. DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.3170 ✓ Crossref‑verified
- Evans & Griffiths (1992) — Caffeine tolerance and choice in humans. Psychopharmacology. DOI: 10.1007/BF02245285 ✓ Crossref‑verified
- Armstrong et al. (2012) — Mild Dehydration Affects Mood in Healthy Young Women. Journal of Nutrition. DOI: 10.3945/jn.111.142000 ✓ Crossref‑verified