Skip to content after assessment

Assessment loading

If the interactive assessment does not start, you can still read the methodology and evidence below, then try again later.

Browse all assessments

Where Your Brain-Nutrition Habits Actually Start

High Performance Culture Nutri
Your Brain Food Profile
Your Brain Food Profile

Where Your Brain-Nutrition Habits Actually Start

A 20-scenario self-report that groups your selected answer points across five editorial dimensions. It is not a validated measure of an underlying trait.

20 scenarios5 groups4 forced choicesno neutral option

Topic context from the cited source; it does not validate this questionnaire or its score thresholds.

— Thomas et al. (2020)
What your answers coverOmega-3 & Fatty AcidsGetting your fats mainly from fish and plants rather than refined oils.Polyphenol DiversityEating a wide range of berries, greens and other colourful plant foods.B-Vitamin AdequacyGetting enough folate, B12 and other B-vitamins from whole foods.Glucose StabilityEating in a way that likely keeps your blood sugar steady.Gut Microbiome SupportEating in a way that feeds and supports your gut bacteria.

Brain Food Self-Reflection: How Does Your Plate Match the Research?

Twenty forced-choice scenarios are summed into editorial answer-score bands; the result does not diagnose or measure an underlying trait.

~7-9 min · Item answers and results stay on this device · Share links and invite cards carry no scores

Answer for your real meals lately, not your shopping list.

A structured self-reflection — not a diagnostic.

This assessment is a structured self-reflection tool and educational resource — it is not a validated diagnostic and is not a substitute for clinical evaluation. Every dimension insight references peer-reviewed literature for educational context only. If you have concerns about your health, consult a qualified professional. Self-report instruments of this kind have no validated retest interval; the four-to-six-week Second Reading is a sensible practice, not a clinical standard.

Welcome back — you have a profile in progress.

Your profile

0 / 

Profile

Dimension profile

The Reading

Strongest dimension

Learn more →
Open the full dossier

Dimension log

This assessment is a structured self-reflection tool and educational resource — it is not a validated diagnostic and is not a substitute for clinical evaluation. Every dimension insight references peer-reviewed literature for educational context only. If you have concerns about your health, consult a qualified professional.

Your answers

Appendix · Method & evidence Nutri · Case file

How this instrument works

This is a 20-item structured self-assessment of your brain-nutrition habits, read across 5 dimensions: Omega-3 & Fatty Acids; Polyphenol Diversity; B-Vitamin Adequacy; Glucose Stability; and Gut Microbiome Support. Each item is a concrete scenario with four forced-choice responses — no neutral midpoint, so every answer commits to a direction — and response order is shuffled on every run to vary position; this implementation has not been tested for bias reduction. 5 of the 20 items are reverse-keyed — the attractive-sounding response is the structurally weak one — with wording intended to challenge socially desirable framing; this design has not been tested for bias reduction.

Scoring combines an overall reading with a per-dimension profile. Cascade flags compare configured dimension totals with editorial thresholds. They do not establish a compound risk and may not reflect the item-level pattern. The result bands are editorial guidance, not clinical thresholds: they organise the reading, they do not describe.

Every dimension insight cites peer-reviewed literature, and most answer reveals do — 7 sources back this instrument, each with DOI metadata supplied at build time; source relevance and claim interpretation remain editorial judgments. Compiled by the High Performance Culture editorial team. Instrument v1.1 · August 2026.

Items
20
Dimensions
5
Format
Forced choice, 4 options
Sources
7
Instrument
v1.1 · August 2026

The 5 editorial answer groups

Omega-3 & Fatty Acids

Strength here looks like eating oily fish at least twice a week, including plant omega-3 sources daily, and keeping refined omega-6 oil use low.

The vulnerable pattern: relying on neither oily fish nor plant-based omega-3 sources, and eating a diet high in refined oils.

Sample itemHow often do you eat oily fish — salmon, sardines, mackerel, trout, or herring?

First structural move: Add oily fish twice this week and one plant omega-3 source daily — tinned sardines or mackerel, and ground flaxseed or walnuts. This is a specific, observable change; it does not predict an effect on your cognition.

Go deeperProtocol: The Cognitive Fuel Protocol →Glossary: Omega-3 fatty acids →

Polyphenol Diversity

Strength here looks like eating colourful fruit and leafy greens daily, drinking tea or coffee consistently, and actively varying the range of plant foods.

The vulnerable pattern: rarely eating colourful plant foods, relying on a narrow plant range, and missing daily variety.

Sample itemHow often do you eat berries — fresh or frozen — or other deeply coloured fruits such as cherries, pomegranates, or dark grapes?

First structural move: Add frozen berries to breakfast daily and one more leafy green portion this week. These are two specific habits to try — not a guaranteed cognitive effect.

Go deeperGlossary: Polyphenols →Glossary: Mediterranean diet →

B-Vitamin Adequacy

Strength here looks like eating folate-rich foods daily, maintaining a consistent B12 source, and building meals around whole foods rather than relying on fortification alone.

The vulnerable pattern: eating few folate-rich foods, lacking a reliable B12 source, and relying heavily on ultra-processed foods.

Sample itemHow often do you eat folate-rich foods — dark leafy greens, legumes, asparagus, or broccoli?

First structural move: Identify your daily B12 source and add a folate-rich food to every day — a tin of legumes, a handful of leafy greens, or a piece of fish. This is a specific dietary habit to try; it is not a test for a deficiency.

Go deeperProtocol: The Energy Systems Protocol →Glossary: ATP →

Glucose Stability

Strength here looks like eating at regular intervals, pairing carbohydrate meals with protein and fibre, and limiting refined carbohydrates and sugary drinks.

The vulnerable pattern: skipping meals or eating irregularly, and relying on refined carbohydrates and sugary drinks without protein or fibre.

Sample itemWhen hunger hits between meals, what's your honest instinct?

First structural move: Set a fixed breakfast and lunch time, then add a protein source to every carbohydrate meal this week. These are two specific habits to observe, not a guaranteed effect on energy or focus.

Go deeperDeep dive: Sugar and the Brain →Glossary: Glycaemic load →Glossary: Glucose →

Gut Microbiome Support

Strength here looks like eating fermented foods daily, eating a wide range of plant food types weekly, including prebiotic sources, and anchoring meals around legumes and whole grains.

The vulnerable pattern: rarely eating fermented foods, relying on a narrow plant range, and avoiding legumes and whole grains.

Sample itemHow consistently do you eat fermented foods — plain yogurt, kefir, sauerkraut, kimchi, miso, or kombucha?

First structural move: Add one fermented food daily and one additional plant food type this week — plain yoghurt and a tin of lentils, or a new vegetable. This is a specific habit to try, not a measure of your microbiome.

Go deeperProtocol: The Vagus Nerve Protocol →Glossary: Microbiome →Glossary: Gut-brain axis →

Questions, answered

Is this a diagnosis?

No. This assessment is a structured self-reflection tool, not a validated clinical instrument. Its result bands are editorial guidance, not clinical thresholds — they organise your answers into a readable profile; they do not describe a condition. If you have concerns about your health or wellbeing, speak to a qualified professional.

How were the questions designed?

Each of the 20 items presents a concrete scenario with four graded responses and no neutral midpoint, so every answer commits to a lean. Items were authored against the peer-reviewed literature listed in the evidence file on this page, and citation metadata is supplied at build time; source relevance and claim interpretation remain editorial judgments. Response order is shuffled on every run to vary position; this implementation has not been tested for bias reduction.

What happens to my answers?

Assessment answers stay on this device. Unfinished progress expires after 30 days. A completed profile and optional comparison history remain until you delete local assessment data or clear browser data. If you opt into email, your email address is sent; item answers are not. If you share a result link, total and dimension scores are included in the URL and may appear in browser, server, CDN, or analytics logs.

How often should I retake it?

The instrument keeps your previous reading and sets the two side by side when you retake — the Second Reading. There is no validated retest interval; repeat only if a raw answer-point comparison would be useful, and do not treat it as confirmed underlying change.

Why bands instead of percentiles?

Because this assessment does not collect a population score set, there is no reader population to rank you against — and we will not invent one. The 5-dimension profile groups selected answer points for editorial display; it is not a validated structural or decision-utility model.

Where does the evidence come from?

Every dimension insight cites peer-reviewed research, and most answer reveals do — 7 sources stand behind this instrument, each with DOI metadata supplied at build time; source relevance and claim interpretation remain editorial judgments. A few reveals are straightforward editorial reasoning from the same evidence base and carry no citation by design. The full list, with DOIs, is in the evidence file below.

The evidence file

7 peer-reviewed sources stand behind this instrument's items and insights.

  1. Gómez-Pinilla (2008) — Brain foods: the effects of nutrients on brain function. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. DOI: 10.1038/nrn2421 ✓ Crossref‑verified
  2. Godos et al. (2023) — Dietary (Poly)phenols and Cognitive Decline: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research. DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.202300472 ✓ Crossref‑verified
  3. Kennedy (2016) — B Vitamins and the Brain: Mechanisms, Dose and Efficacy—A Review. Nutrients. DOI: 10.3390/nu8020068 ✓ Crossref‑verified
  4. Arshad et al. (2025) — Role of Dietary Carbohydrates in Cognitive Function: A Review. Food Science & Nutrition. DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.70516 ✓ Crossref‑verified
  5. Zandifar et al. (2025) — The Effect of Prebiotics and Probiotics on Levels of Depression, Anxiety, and Cognitive Function: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. Brain and Behavior. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.70401 ✓ Crossref‑verified
  6. Ross et al. (2024) — The interplay between diet and the gut microbiome: implications for health and disease. Nature Reviews Microbiology. DOI: 10.1038/s41579-024-01068-4 ✓ Crossref‑verified
  7. Thomas et al. (2020) — Blood polyunsaturated omega-3 fatty acids, brain atrophy, cognitive decline, and dementia risk. Alzheimer's & Dementia. DOI: 10.1002/alz.12195 ✓ Crossref‑verified

High-Performance Insights